Hi dears,
I want a new outlook..... First I will tell you a bit about me. I am 23yrs old. Lean(not that much, weight is 46Kg %26amp; height is 5'3.)
i am an average looking girl with medium complexion. my skin is oily which gives me a lot of pimples on my face.my face is ovel shapy with a high forehead. there is one more bad character for my skin; that it gets scars very easily and the scars never go quickly which gives my face, hands and legs a very ugly picture. i wear spex which gives me a look of class teacher.
i am working in Tourism industry for which a good appearence is a must! i try to be smart but never i won a appreciation though everyone praise my working ability.
I am thinking about an overall change in my life. for that i need to change my luk. please give me tips for my face, hairstyle and dressing.
Can anyone help me for a new appearence?
Firstly, its really good you want to change an have no reservations in talking about yourself.
Look, you're really lucky.....no weight....well that's great!
Medium complexion....so you needn't worry about that either bcoz you got the advantage of wearing all colours. However always protect your skin with sunblock when you go out to prevent tanning and wrinkling. Also cleanse, tone and moisturise before going to bed.
The problem you do however have is of acne. Acne is a medical problem faced by numerous adolescents and younger adults. Well for that you just need to go to the skin specialist, nearby and you will get rid of it in a month's time with a few drugs and a regular cleaning regimen. The golden rule is never to touch the pimples.
Spects are not a bane but a boon to ones personality nowadays. Just pick a nice slim frame that matches your face in a colour that goes with all clothes, like black or neutral steel. Go for thin lenses. If you insist on less usage of spects then off course contact lenses are the next best thing. Go for disposable ones..........but use them with strict hygiene and follow your doc's advice to the book .
go to to a good salon and ask the stylist for a cut that suits you. Here also, stick to a cut for all occasions, both open and tied hair and off course good cleaning, conditioning and no dandruff is the success mantra.
Clothes are entirely up to you. With western you have the benefit for lot of comfort. Tourism industry also prefers a lot of formal look. so go for business attire.......well fitted trousers, shirts and a blazer / coat. some must have colours are black, grey, beige for suits....and shirts in all pastels look good for day dressing. High heels for the shoes and sandals with thin straps.
salwar suits are also great, with small patterns or plain. you can work with all kinds colour. but a bad fitting spoils the show. go for a good tailor. you can experiment with all kinds of cuts, but don't go overboard with the neck lines.
what else.....hmm.........you can accessorise.....but don't use too much and too many things. a small feminine watch and a thin bracelet look great. small diamond studs or a thin chain...its all up to you. a cute small handbag.
natural beauty looks much better than make-up. but still a light lip gloss with kajal or thin liner looks simple and elegant.
last but not the least..........there's nothing like confidence and a feel good factor. think positive, smile and walk confident. there is no substitute to inner beauty.
Reply:first meet a skin specialist;then,meet a beautician.i suggest you wear a suitable lady hat, like golf cap or berret cap.cooling glass will add attraction.sulvar cummeez is enough.use mouth wash also.
Reply:get in a routine of situps and running!
try to ear healthier. stress less, and sleep more.
get proactive, or a goodgood race wash!
ask your stylist how to do your hair
whiten your teeth
be happy%26amp;condident.
Reply:wow your lite!
Reply:1. Have sound sleep of seven hours at night only. Avoid late night.
2.After brushing teeth, drink two glass of water.
3.Take breakfast with milk and paratha.
4.Drink water each two hours and go to toilet in day time.
5.Have lunch at four hours gap after breakfast. Take balanced food.
6.Snacks are needed in evening. walk fifteen minutes twice daily before breakfast and before dinner.
7.Dinner time is between 8 to 9 pm. Help your family members in house hold. This will keep you joyful.
8. Listen to good music like sitar, sarod, flute, santoor etc. This will keep you optimistic and automatically, you start taking care of people around you and get enough satisfaction in life. Don't worry, you are such a beautiful soul, no need to worry at all for external appearance.
Reply:Hi,
First of all be confident. Then try to change to change yourself, then u will see a good change in ur life.
The first imp. thing is that not only the out look is preferred, but u r estimated by ur working skills and communications I feel.
First of all, for ur height 5'3, u put up weight by taking good food and which helps u in putting up weight. U can be upto 52.
Take banana with curd rice 2 times a day and also dry fruits, fresh vegetables and other nutritioous food.
Then about the skin, u get so many skin cleansing creams for both oily and also dry skin. after coming from work, clean ur face with those lotions and apply good cream which suits ur skin which u get from market.
And about scars, pl. don't touch a pimple after it comes, sometimes u may get itches, but if u touch them u will get a scar. So if scars appear, pl. rub a lemon piece on those scars and slowly they disappear.
Who had oily face, they should clean the face more then 4 to 5 times a day.
Always wear somwhow dark colours and also small designs dresses or diognal dresses. So that u will not look lean.
And lastly, for ur forehead, cut the front hair going to the parlour, so that it fall somehow to the front covering ur long forehead and looking smart.
Ok. Try these and I feel this may help out.
Reply:Dear Sister, you can contact DR RAJAN T.D via email and he being an expert dermatologist based in MUMBAI will give you the best opinion. He has been my skin doctor since last 10 and half years and believe me he is an expert in his field. All the best
Email: rajan.td@gmail.com
Reply:use
rose water to p[revent them
yogurt to make pimples smaller
honey to prevent the dark spots
try
water
quit juck foods
exercise
fruits,veggies
yoga.......just 20 min a day
run
confident
think that u are beautifull
Friday, November 20, 2009
What is the most Humane way of killing an animal for fur ?
Animals are skinned alive for their fur. From what I heard, they are skinned alive because of the thing in blood called solid7 or something that makes it hard to peel off.
I really DIS the people who kill and wear fur. But I noticed that many or them are still wearing fur despite endless messages put across to stop wearing fur.
I just want to know since, we can't stop it. Is there another alternative to kill them more swiftly and painlessly that maybe could be implemented to fur industries to tentatively control the cruelty until the whole fur trade is put to a stop.
What is the most Humane way of killing an animal for fur ?
I do not know- But I really appreciate your efforts. That's the kind of thing more people should do. I like that you recognize that people are going to still do it, so try to make it better at least.
Keep that attitude up and you will be able to make many changes through out your life!!
Reply:People with a cave-mans mentality wear fur. It doesn't matter how fast or how painless an animal is killed. The point is why that animal is killed in the first place. Are people really so cold nowadays that they still feel the need to wear fur?
Reply:I don't believe they should take fur, but they could have some kind of tranquilizer that "puts them to sleep".
That would be more humane.
Jack.
Reply:on fur farms for small animals like foxs , minx and other small animals thay are not skinned alive they are put in a crowded confined room were carbon minoxide and other gases are pumped in to kill the animals .
people say this is the most human way of killing them but its not it can take 30minutes for the 50 or so animals to die and while in this chamber many go crazy , have fits and other horrible side affects before they die .
there is no human way of killing animals for fur it is always barbic and cruel .
I understand where your coming from but to find a new to make animals suffer more is cruel and just gives those in the fur trade the thought that what there doing is justified .
Reply:Hmmm. What is the most humane way to increase the consciousness level of humans from -1 to 100+ so the question would not need to even be asked? :))
Reply:This can be reduced to an issue of economics. Its called supply and demand. Now as long as there is a demand, than there will be a supply of furs gained by unscrupulous people. When you can remove the demand, the practice will go away. Let's all band together to try to get the message trough to people who would buy furs for any purpose. Modern synthectic materials can simulate any fur quite well. I wouldn't mind earing a recycled plastic milk carton jacket if you would.
Reply:Trap the animal in a large, comfortable home where friendly people live. Feed it well, love it lots, kill it with kindness, let it die of old age.
I really DIS the people who kill and wear fur. But I noticed that many or them are still wearing fur despite endless messages put across to stop wearing fur.
I just want to know since, we can't stop it. Is there another alternative to kill them more swiftly and painlessly that maybe could be implemented to fur industries to tentatively control the cruelty until the whole fur trade is put to a stop.
What is the most Humane way of killing an animal for fur ?
I do not know- But I really appreciate your efforts. That's the kind of thing more people should do. I like that you recognize that people are going to still do it, so try to make it better at least.
Keep that attitude up and you will be able to make many changes through out your life!!
Reply:People with a cave-mans mentality wear fur. It doesn't matter how fast or how painless an animal is killed. The point is why that animal is killed in the first place. Are people really so cold nowadays that they still feel the need to wear fur?
Reply:I don't believe they should take fur, but they could have some kind of tranquilizer that "puts them to sleep".
That would be more humane.
Jack.
Reply:on fur farms for small animals like foxs , minx and other small animals thay are not skinned alive they are put in a crowded confined room were carbon minoxide and other gases are pumped in to kill the animals .
people say this is the most human way of killing them but its not it can take 30minutes for the 50 or so animals to die and while in this chamber many go crazy , have fits and other horrible side affects before they die .
there is no human way of killing animals for fur it is always barbic and cruel .
I understand where your coming from but to find a new to make animals suffer more is cruel and just gives those in the fur trade the thought that what there doing is justified .
Reply:Hmmm. What is the most humane way to increase the consciousness level of humans from -1 to 100+ so the question would not need to even be asked? :))
Reply:This can be reduced to an issue of economics. Its called supply and demand. Now as long as there is a demand, than there will be a supply of furs gained by unscrupulous people. When you can remove the demand, the practice will go away. Let's all band together to try to get the message trough to people who would buy furs for any purpose. Modern synthectic materials can simulate any fur quite well. I wouldn't mind earing a recycled plastic milk carton jacket if you would.
Reply:Trap the animal in a large, comfortable home where friendly people live. Feed it well, love it lots, kill it with kindness, let it die of old age.
Makeup Ideas?
I love makeup and wear a moderate amount every day. I like to do more sometimes. I have a decent level of skill. Do you have ideas of colors I could wear and techniques I might want to apply to my makeup regimen, and brand recommendations? Maybe links to pictures, or celebrities to be inspired by. I have normal skin with rare breakouts, some yellow tones to my skin, and I wear a MAC NC20 foundation, but I do tan to a light golden brown. I'm 21 and I work in the Hawaii real estate industry, so recommendations for work would be great. Thank you! :-)
Makeup Ideas?
I love how your eyes stand out! You should experiment with different colored eyeshadows and liners...try browns, teals, and purples...and add a pink blush to the apples of your cheeks for a flushed look...good luck!
Reply:you should experiment by blending different colours like purple and blue, orange and red, try not mixing up one cool colour to a warm colour or you will look like a clown(but yellow and green totally goes)...hope it helps...
warm colours = red, orange, yellow
cool colours = purple, blue, green
Reply:your really pretty. i think browns would look good on you. or dark purples. and brown eyeliner not black.
good luck and i hope i helped.
Makeup Ideas?
I love how your eyes stand out! You should experiment with different colored eyeshadows and liners...try browns, teals, and purples...and add a pink blush to the apples of your cheeks for a flushed look...good luck!
Reply:you should experiment by blending different colours like purple and blue, orange and red, try not mixing up one cool colour to a warm colour or you will look like a clown(but yellow and green totally goes)...hope it helps...
warm colours = red, orange, yellow
cool colours = purple, blue, green
Reply:your really pretty. i think browns would look good on you. or dark purples. and brown eyeliner not black.
good luck and i hope i helped.
Pimples at bases of hair down there?
I have little red pimples at the base of my pubic hairs(generally with 2-3 hairs coming from the same spot when there is a pimple).
When i pull the hair(s) out there is some white puss that is attached to the part of the hair that was under the skin. (So its not really puss but just a white substance that is attached to the hair i guess.)
I was thinking it might be Folliculitis (a staph skin infection)? Does anyone know if that sounds like a case of folliculitis?
Any comments would be appreciated, especially from professionals in the health care industry.
Oh, and i was just tested for STDs and it came back negative just in case you where wondering...
Pimples at bases of hair down there?
You diagnosed it yourself. It sounds like Folliculitis (an infection of the hair follicle). What happens is you get an ingrown hair (especially curly hair) where the hair actually curls under into the skin. Eventually this causes a skin infection (pus, redness, pain).
The problem is these tend to reoccur in the same area. It's really important to shower regularly and don't share your towel.
Your chances are greater when you have a cold or runny nose. (The mucos for there CAN infect the hair follicles). I had a chronic case of this and my doc recommended that I put antibiotic ointment inside my nose.
As mentioned, this offen reoccurs in the same place and may be difficult to treat. For stubborn cases, a doc may prescribe tetrycycline (antibiotic).
I had a nasty bout of follicullitis on my back and chest that was only diagnosed after my dermatologist did a biopsy.
Reply:Its just an "infected" hair and absolutely nothing to worry about. It's really pretty common %26amp; no big deal. Just keep pulling the hair %26amp; then gently squeezing the little bump. If it becomes more than just the little bump you could see a Dr but right now it's no biggie!
Reply:Dull blade. Use skin conditioner both before and after. Use a tweezers, use rubbing alcohol to get rid of the bumps and try to un-imbed the hairs (pubic hair is course and curly, it's growing back down into the skin, you need to get those hairs out).
Reply:Hey that sometimes happen to me also, but I only have one or two of those "pimples" every now and then (every 2-3 months maybe as it is very seldom). They sometimes have this blackheads right? I dismiss it as normal because as I said, I only see it occassionally. I'm sorry but I also don't know what it is, it doesn't seem like follicultis because I don't have an itching, redness or burning feeling on the site. Well I suggest if you are bothered with this, you should check it with a dermatologist or your OB.
When i pull the hair(s) out there is some white puss that is attached to the part of the hair that was under the skin. (So its not really puss but just a white substance that is attached to the hair i guess.)
I was thinking it might be Folliculitis (a staph skin infection)? Does anyone know if that sounds like a case of folliculitis?
Any comments would be appreciated, especially from professionals in the health care industry.
Oh, and i was just tested for STDs and it came back negative just in case you where wondering...
Pimples at bases of hair down there?
You diagnosed it yourself. It sounds like Folliculitis (an infection of the hair follicle). What happens is you get an ingrown hair (especially curly hair) where the hair actually curls under into the skin. Eventually this causes a skin infection (pus, redness, pain).
The problem is these tend to reoccur in the same area. It's really important to shower regularly and don't share your towel.
Your chances are greater when you have a cold or runny nose. (The mucos for there CAN infect the hair follicles). I had a chronic case of this and my doc recommended that I put antibiotic ointment inside my nose.
As mentioned, this offen reoccurs in the same place and may be difficult to treat. For stubborn cases, a doc may prescribe tetrycycline (antibiotic).
I had a nasty bout of follicullitis on my back and chest that was only diagnosed after my dermatologist did a biopsy.
Reply:Its just an "infected" hair and absolutely nothing to worry about. It's really pretty common %26amp; no big deal. Just keep pulling the hair %26amp; then gently squeezing the little bump. If it becomes more than just the little bump you could see a Dr but right now it's no biggie!
Reply:Dull blade. Use skin conditioner both before and after. Use a tweezers, use rubbing alcohol to get rid of the bumps and try to un-imbed the hairs (pubic hair is course and curly, it's growing back down into the skin, you need to get those hairs out).
Reply:Hey that sometimes happen to me also, but I only have one or two of those "pimples" every now and then (every 2-3 months maybe as it is very seldom). They sometimes have this blackheads right? I dismiss it as normal because as I said, I only see it occassionally. I'm sorry but I also don't know what it is, it doesn't seem like follicultis because I don't have an itching, redness or burning feeling on the site. Well I suggest if you are bothered with this, you should check it with a dermatologist or your OB.
Does anyone else find people who tan unattractive?
I can't stand white girls who tan. 1) the fashion industry hypes that it is the trend but it does not look good just really fake and 2) it causes skin cancer. But I guess this does not matter with the soon to be premature aging and eventual leatherface that also goes with it.
Seriously spending money to have your skin tanned is retarded and proves how dumb and insecure these people really are. On a related note I wouldn't mind opening up a tanning business and taking some serious money off these mindless sheep.
Does anyone else find people who tan unattractive?
I have fair skin. it is not unhealthy at all, and i dont need "a little color."
What is unhealthy is continuously tanning. A person does not need "a little color" if they have healthy skin, tan or not
Reply:I agree it's f'n disgusting.
Reply:get a life and pay attention to your own life
Reply:I tanned this past summer, but didn't get to the point where it was too much. Mainly because I started to feel almost sick to my stomach that I was putting myself at such great risk for melanoma. But in all honesty, I really like the way I look tan better than when I'm not tan.
Reply:I think spending money to gt tanned is ridiculous. Girls in ym HIGH SCHOOL do it....at such a young age! It's sooo bad for your skin and it can look super fake if you overdo even jsut a little. I dono why it's so popular, half the time it turns out too dark/orange, and it costs a heck of a lot of money. I'm never going to a tanning salon in my life!!!
Reply:god i can't stand those rich tanned paris hilton type white girls. It's the most selfish unattractive thing to me.
Reply:If its over the top, yeah it looks pretty trashy. But fish belly white is gross.
Reply:I prefer pale skin
Reply:While I agree with the skin cancer thing and certainly that some people over do it. I think it's a personal preference as to what you want to look like. I think it looks good on some people but others just look like they are wearing a full body leather suit. Maybe you would make a far better profit if you become a dermatologist to help with the skin cancer after the tanning.
Reply:i dont tan. cause i cant get any darker! girls who do that spray tan is disgusting! over the weekend they are like" hey girl look how dark i got over the weekend! i love my new tan!" newsflash b*tch! you look like a f'n oompa-loompa. then they tell me im jealous. hey id rather be as white as paper than orange like a b*tch.
and guys who tan, lets just say...GAY!
love lis! :)
Reply:Are you serious? So when a white woman goes out into the sun to enjoy the outdoors of; lets say a beach or a nice hike...we should coat ourselves in SPF 500??? I don't think so, if it wasn't natural to get a tan from the melatonin in your skin...then God would not have made it possible!
Reply:No I have to say that I only partially agree with you. Being pale white it disgusting and it looks unhealthy. People should have a little bit of color on them. But I do think that OVER tanning is unattractive. I've been tanning in the summer months for two years now and I've seen women who are TOO dark that it just looks very unnatural, and that's not what we're going for. I think that people should get some color on their skin and then stop going tanning. Quitting while you're ahead is winning the game. ; )
Reply:I think getting tan, unaturally, is tacky
Reply:While I don't share you negativity, I agree to a point. And that point is where the girls stop looking healthy and naturally tan, and start to look fake.
A little bit of color is enough to give that glow, and slim your body.
http://www.asontv.com/images/products/Ep...
Going too dark looks fake, and often orange on many women with pale skin.
http://www.brideonline.com.au/qld/hollyw...
The health and beauty reasons you listed as a negative result from sun exposure are true, that's why most women use some form of self tanner, i.e. spray on, a creme, airbrushing, etc...
As for it being dumb and/or insecure, I don't see how tanning is any different than hair dye, makeup, nail polish, or any other way women use to look and feel better about themselves.
Reply:I couldn't agree more! I come from CT where that's all the girls EVER do. I think it's rediculous that they're actually paying for some sun. The rays from a salon are more harmful since they're not natural and the sun emits Vitamin D which helps in the preventing of colon cancer, and the tanning salons do not.
You can laugh when those girls that went to tanning salons all their life have trouble crapping because of not going out in the sun instead. And I think taking advantage of them would be awesome! They deserve it. If they have enough money to do that a few times a week and drive around in their fancy cars...then you should reap the benefits of getting all their money :-)
Reply:i agree. its kind of funny how white people always talk about the darker skinned ones, and they they go and try to make THEIR SKIN DARKER AND LESS PALE.....hmmmm.....
Reply:On the one hand I agree with you, because I am victim of tanning myself. As a naive and insecure teenager, I used sunbeds obsessively. It was actually a real addiction, as I have OCD and also issues with my body image. I deeply regret it now, but since the age of 17, I have taken amazing care of my skin, so I am hoping it will pay off in the long run.
Everytime I see a new tanning salon open, I just want to boycott it. It makes me angry, because of the troubles I have had since using sunbeds. My life has literally been turned upside down because of sunbeds and I don't want it to happen to anyone else.
But, I didn't think your comment about exploiting these young, insecure girls was very amusing. If you truly cared, you would not have made that end comment and I have to say I was a bit sickened by it. Sorry, but it was distasteful. If you want to help, then spread the word and raise awareness, but don't be a prick about it.
You don't understand the pressures on young girls today and that they will do just about anything to feel accepted by society. Teenagers always believe they are immortal, they don't even consider that cancer will affect them, they think they are immune. If you want to blame anyone, blame the media and the flawless images portrayed, that show thin, tanned women. And when girls that are as young as 4 and 5 see these images, it is already starting to be ingrained into their heads, that this is how they should look to be acceptable. Tell me what is wrong with this picture......
Take care : )
Seriously spending money to have your skin tanned is retarded and proves how dumb and insecure these people really are. On a related note I wouldn't mind opening up a tanning business and taking some serious money off these mindless sheep.
Does anyone else find people who tan unattractive?
I have fair skin. it is not unhealthy at all, and i dont need "a little color."
What is unhealthy is continuously tanning. A person does not need "a little color" if they have healthy skin, tan or not
Reply:I agree it's f'n disgusting.
Reply:get a life and pay attention to your own life
Reply:I tanned this past summer, but didn't get to the point where it was too much. Mainly because I started to feel almost sick to my stomach that I was putting myself at such great risk for melanoma. But in all honesty, I really like the way I look tan better than when I'm not tan.
Reply:I think spending money to gt tanned is ridiculous. Girls in ym HIGH SCHOOL do it....at such a young age! It's sooo bad for your skin and it can look super fake if you overdo even jsut a little. I dono why it's so popular, half the time it turns out too dark/orange, and it costs a heck of a lot of money. I'm never going to a tanning salon in my life!!!
Reply:god i can't stand those rich tanned paris hilton type white girls. It's the most selfish unattractive thing to me.
Reply:If its over the top, yeah it looks pretty trashy. But fish belly white is gross.
Reply:I prefer pale skin
Reply:While I agree with the skin cancer thing and certainly that some people over do it. I think it's a personal preference as to what you want to look like. I think it looks good on some people but others just look like they are wearing a full body leather suit. Maybe you would make a far better profit if you become a dermatologist to help with the skin cancer after the tanning.
Reply:i dont tan. cause i cant get any darker! girls who do that spray tan is disgusting! over the weekend they are like" hey girl look how dark i got over the weekend! i love my new tan!" newsflash b*tch! you look like a f'n oompa-loompa. then they tell me im jealous. hey id rather be as white as paper than orange like a b*tch.
and guys who tan, lets just say...GAY!
love lis! :)
Reply:Are you serious? So when a white woman goes out into the sun to enjoy the outdoors of; lets say a beach or a nice hike...we should coat ourselves in SPF 500??? I don't think so, if it wasn't natural to get a tan from the melatonin in your skin...then God would not have made it possible!
Reply:No I have to say that I only partially agree with you. Being pale white it disgusting and it looks unhealthy. People should have a little bit of color on them. But I do think that OVER tanning is unattractive. I've been tanning in the summer months for two years now and I've seen women who are TOO dark that it just looks very unnatural, and that's not what we're going for. I think that people should get some color on their skin and then stop going tanning. Quitting while you're ahead is winning the game. ; )
Reply:I think getting tan, unaturally, is tacky
Reply:While I don't share you negativity, I agree to a point. And that point is where the girls stop looking healthy and naturally tan, and start to look fake.
A little bit of color is enough to give that glow, and slim your body.
http://www.asontv.com/images/products/Ep...
Going too dark looks fake, and often orange on many women with pale skin.
http://www.brideonline.com.au/qld/hollyw...
The health and beauty reasons you listed as a negative result from sun exposure are true, that's why most women use some form of self tanner, i.e. spray on, a creme, airbrushing, etc...
As for it being dumb and/or insecure, I don't see how tanning is any different than hair dye, makeup, nail polish, or any other way women use to look and feel better about themselves.
Reply:I couldn't agree more! I come from CT where that's all the girls EVER do. I think it's rediculous that they're actually paying for some sun. The rays from a salon are more harmful since they're not natural and the sun emits Vitamin D which helps in the preventing of colon cancer, and the tanning salons do not.
You can laugh when those girls that went to tanning salons all their life have trouble crapping because of not going out in the sun instead. And I think taking advantage of them would be awesome! They deserve it. If they have enough money to do that a few times a week and drive around in their fancy cars...then you should reap the benefits of getting all their money :-)
Reply:i agree. its kind of funny how white people always talk about the darker skinned ones, and they they go and try to make THEIR SKIN DARKER AND LESS PALE.....hmmmm.....
Reply:On the one hand I agree with you, because I am victim of tanning myself. As a naive and insecure teenager, I used sunbeds obsessively. It was actually a real addiction, as I have OCD and also issues with my body image. I deeply regret it now, but since the age of 17, I have taken amazing care of my skin, so I am hoping it will pay off in the long run.
Everytime I see a new tanning salon open, I just want to boycott it. It makes me angry, because of the troubles I have had since using sunbeds. My life has literally been turned upside down because of sunbeds and I don't want it to happen to anyone else.
But, I didn't think your comment about exploiting these young, insecure girls was very amusing. If you truly cared, you would not have made that end comment and I have to say I was a bit sickened by it. Sorry, but it was distasteful. If you want to help, then spread the word and raise awareness, but don't be a prick about it.
You don't understand the pressures on young girls today and that they will do just about anything to feel accepted by society. Teenagers always believe they are immortal, they don't even consider that cancer will affect them, they think they are immune. If you want to blame anyone, blame the media and the flawless images portrayed, that show thin, tanned women. And when girls that are as young as 4 and 5 see these images, it is already starting to be ingrained into their heads, that this is how they should look to be acceptable. Tell me what is wrong with this picture......
Take care : )
Vanity Fair's `Top 100' offensive or controversial? Comment please?
If you think that the United States is run by a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite, think again. The reality is very much otherwise, according to an old-line American magazine that did, indeed, once rank as a voice of the so-called “WASP” establishment.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
Vanity Fair's `Top 100' offensive or controversial? Comment please?
Didn't take too long for the anti-Semitic card to come out,now there's a surprise.
Of course it's of great concern that any one group should gain such a powerful hold on the country that polices the world (whether it likes it or not).
It also lends more credence to the claim by the Islamic world that America is waging a 'Holy War'.One has to ask then, like Israel and Palestine are in a perpetual battle has this Jewish influence in America brought an unending war for its people?
I think it has and it was deliberately brought to get America fully behind it in order to secure an Israel with no Palestinian state.
Take also the talks regarding Israel/Palestine at the moment.Knowing that America is so heavily influenced by Jewish money no Palestinian sitting at the negotiating table is going to expect America to show anything other than bias.America's not going to bite the hand that feeds it!
It's a monopoly and that's never good.
I notice Americans have adopted their version of the anti-semitic card too now in an attempt to drown out all criticism.
Reply:i agree
Reply:So whats your point? America is for the corporations that step on the citizens and crush them. Does it really matter what race they are? People of all races have greedy individuals as well as good people. What are you going to do about this besides posting things like this? I bet you aren't even registered to vote.
Reply:So what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:There is more nonsense in this question per line than in any other question in Yahoo Answers.
Just to straighten things out, the Newhouse family is unknown in the Zionist movement.
The asker is just spreading that old anti-Semtic myth that the Jews control the world.
Does he really think that the people here are so stupid as to belive such hateful lies?
Is he not ashamed of himself?
.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
Vanity Fair's `Top 100' offensive or controversial? Comment please?
Didn't take too long for the anti-Semitic card to come out,now there's a surprise.
Of course it's of great concern that any one group should gain such a powerful hold on the country that polices the world (whether it likes it or not).
It also lends more credence to the claim by the Islamic world that America is waging a 'Holy War'.One has to ask then, like Israel and Palestine are in a perpetual battle has this Jewish influence in America brought an unending war for its people?
I think it has and it was deliberately brought to get America fully behind it in order to secure an Israel with no Palestinian state.
Take also the talks regarding Israel/Palestine at the moment.Knowing that America is so heavily influenced by Jewish money no Palestinian sitting at the negotiating table is going to expect America to show anything other than bias.America's not going to bite the hand that feeds it!
It's a monopoly and that's never good.
I notice Americans have adopted their version of the anti-semitic card too now in an attempt to drown out all criticism.
Reply:i agree
Reply:So whats your point? America is for the corporations that step on the citizens and crush them. Does it really matter what race they are? People of all races have greedy individuals as well as good people. What are you going to do about this besides posting things like this? I bet you aren't even registered to vote.
Reply:So what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:There is more nonsense in this question per line than in any other question in Yahoo Answers.
Just to straighten things out, the Newhouse family is unknown in the Zionist movement.
The asker is just spreading that old anti-Semtic myth that the Jews control the world.
Does he really think that the people here are so stupid as to belive such hateful lies?
Is he not ashamed of himself?
.
Black woman my man asked me to bleach pt2?
I told his cousin what he said about him saying I should bleach 2 look more like Ciara .The cousin told me dat he had though I was gettin to dark lately cus i used to be lighter brown so called and he was going to order me for my birthday skin lightening creams from his cousin from Egypt cus his Egptian .I wasn't exposed to now but this was ment to make me happy I told the cousin its rediculous it over, and he told me just try it I might like it if u don't stop then the other cousin who's agirl told me if u want to get into music and your a girl u need to be fair skin I asked her who told her that information she said a guy she met in the music industry.
Black woman my man asked me to bleach pt2?
dump the guy. u shouldnt change ur self for no one. if he dont like the way u r then he u shouldnt be with him.being with someone is bcuz u like them the way there are. or tell him how u feel. if he doesnt change then i say get it over with.
Reply:wow.
so whats your question about this?
Reply:well it seems like your boyfriend has issues that he only is looking at you because of your color. Regardless if you lighten or darken you still will be the same person. Get rid of him, who knows what else he might ask you.
Reply:the truth to get in the music industry you need courage and a good freaking song, after that you will forget about everybodys openion
Reply:I think your make up artist would do that for u when u get into music industry!! thats if u desire it anyways .. or ur producer does! U just need talent, courage and stubborness! Thats it! Doesnt matter what color u r! whoever told u that is pathetic!
Reply:i don't fully understand your story but don't do anything to please a man. Next point, Missy Elliott is very dark, i rest my case.
Reply:Im a white guy but i can help. there are many dark skinned black women in entertainment. And i think that more and more will be coming in since most of us white guys are black women lovers finally coming out of the closet. your boyfriend sounds like an idiot and if hes trying to change you you should consider leaving him. dark women are the sexiest women alive i think and most of them have incredible bodies and im sure u do to.
Reply:OK you need to utilize spell check. It was painful trying to figure out what you were saying. Anywhoo he sounds just as stupid as you but in a different way. Two points!!!!
creeping
Black woman my man asked me to bleach pt2?
dump the guy. u shouldnt change ur self for no one. if he dont like the way u r then he u shouldnt be with him.being with someone is bcuz u like them the way there are. or tell him how u feel. if he doesnt change then i say get it over with.
Reply:wow.
so whats your question about this?
Reply:well it seems like your boyfriend has issues that he only is looking at you because of your color. Regardless if you lighten or darken you still will be the same person. Get rid of him, who knows what else he might ask you.
Reply:the truth to get in the music industry you need courage and a good freaking song, after that you will forget about everybodys openion
Reply:I think your make up artist would do that for u when u get into music industry!! thats if u desire it anyways .. or ur producer does! U just need talent, courage and stubborness! Thats it! Doesnt matter what color u r! whoever told u that is pathetic!
Reply:i don't fully understand your story but don't do anything to please a man. Next point, Missy Elliott is very dark, i rest my case.
Reply:Im a white guy but i can help. there are many dark skinned black women in entertainment. And i think that more and more will be coming in since most of us white guys are black women lovers finally coming out of the closet. your boyfriend sounds like an idiot and if hes trying to change you you should consider leaving him. dark women are the sexiest women alive i think and most of them have incredible bodies and im sure u do to.
Reply:OK you need to utilize spell check. It was painful trying to figure out what you were saying. Anywhoo he sounds just as stupid as you but in a different way. Two points!!!!
creeping
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
ok, im a big fan of America's Next Top Model. I know some think it superficial but it's entertainment!!! im so sick of people complaining about Brooke being eliminated last night, and they keep hating on Tyra, like shes the devil for letting such a nice 18 year old go. thats not what the competition is about and i think people keep forgetting what the fashion/model industry really is! its not nice, AT ALL...so why do you expect Tyra to cut slack? i think Brooke was just a cute, sweet girl. i didnt see a "top model" at all. the ones you all hate the most, like Anchal and Jaeda...for having a lack of confidence..they really have the looks and height it takes to sell in this industry. i hope Anchal steps it up and wins.the twins are boring and have really bad posture/hunchbacks. also, Eugena is pretty but pimply..BUT with clear skin she has top model looks. so does Jaeda,but ppl say she looks manly..that works in photos %26amp; looks more edgy. caridee is the typical blonde, its boring. period.
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
The truth is that this season is highly debated. Brooke, yes she is a young , pretty girl yet she was sent home. Face it, someone has to go every week. I know it hurts to see your faves go : hush...I am black and I do not think that Jada and Eugena are been kept there because of their color. They show potential but I am just tired of hearing Jada whine about her hair.
Another big night for Melrose, she is not that popular but might just end up winning. And what the hell has gotten to Tyra's head, she seems unnecessarily harsh at times...- chill out girl
Reply:You know, I think they set up some of the girls to go home. You see them taking photos and then they choose one to represent them. How do you know that they are actually choosing the best? I liked brooke, but I really don't care. I would rather that Melrose goes. She's really irritating. I guess that's why she isn't leaving.
Reply:Yes, Brooke was cute and sweet in person, but she was also able to bring a certain depth and soul to her photos that empty-eyed Eugenia and pathetic "Boo-hoo-I-have-short-hair" Jaeda never could, yet they are still around and Brooke is gone. A model needs to be able to take good PHOTOS. Sure, Eugenia and Jaeda are gorgeous, but it takes more than that to make it as a model, as Tyra herself likes to say rather often. If you can't deliver on film, you should go. Brooke delivered. AJ delivered (she was too cool for the cheesy couple photo shot. You could tell she thought it was stupid). Caridee (I disagree with you - she brings a uniqueness and style to her photos that make her more than a typical blonde), Melrose, the twins, and even Anchal deliver, but Eugenia and Jaeda don't, yet they are still on the show. That's what bummed me out. Brooke had far more promise than Jaeda and Eugenia combined. And Anchal? Gorgeous, yes, but completely devoid of confidence. A shame too because she could totally run off with this thing.
Reply:i didn't feel like she had the worst pictures this week. i'd give that to jaeda or eugena. part of working in the industry is being able to be approachable. not saying the person has to be super nice just approachable, and humble. melrose to me has the worst attitude of the girls remaining.
i love tyra, but i do think this season she is a little more into herself. i understand it is a show and they want good tv. i'm just surprised by the way this season has gone so far.
i love anchal but she needs to be confident!
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
The truth is that this season is highly debated. Brooke, yes she is a young , pretty girl yet she was sent home. Face it, someone has to go every week. I know it hurts to see your faves go : hush...I am black and I do not think that Jada and Eugena are been kept there because of their color. They show potential but I am just tired of hearing Jada whine about her hair.
Another big night for Melrose, she is not that popular but might just end up winning. And what the hell has gotten to Tyra's head, she seems unnecessarily harsh at times...- chill out girl
Reply:You know, I think they set up some of the girls to go home. You see them taking photos and then they choose one to represent them. How do you know that they are actually choosing the best? I liked brooke, but I really don't care. I would rather that Melrose goes. She's really irritating. I guess that's why she isn't leaving.
Reply:Yes, Brooke was cute and sweet in person, but she was also able to bring a certain depth and soul to her photos that empty-eyed Eugenia and pathetic "Boo-hoo-I-have-short-hair" Jaeda never could, yet they are still around and Brooke is gone. A model needs to be able to take good PHOTOS. Sure, Eugenia and Jaeda are gorgeous, but it takes more than that to make it as a model, as Tyra herself likes to say rather often. If you can't deliver on film, you should go. Brooke delivered. AJ delivered (she was too cool for the cheesy couple photo shot. You could tell she thought it was stupid). Caridee (I disagree with you - she brings a uniqueness and style to her photos that make her more than a typical blonde), Melrose, the twins, and even Anchal deliver, but Eugenia and Jaeda don't, yet they are still on the show. That's what bummed me out. Brooke had far more promise than Jaeda and Eugenia combined. And Anchal? Gorgeous, yes, but completely devoid of confidence. A shame too because she could totally run off with this thing.
Reply:i didn't feel like she had the worst pictures this week. i'd give that to jaeda or eugena. part of working in the industry is being able to be approachable. not saying the person has to be super nice just approachable, and humble. melrose to me has the worst attitude of the girls remaining.
i love tyra, but i do think this season she is a little more into herself. i understand it is a show and they want good tv. i'm just surprised by the way this season has gone so far.
i love anchal but she needs to be confident!
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
ok, im a big fan of America's Next Top Model. I know some think it superficial but it's entertainment!!! im so sick of people complaining about Brooke being eliminated last night, and they keep hating on Tyra, like shes the devil for letting such a nice 18 year old go. thats not what the competition is about and i think people keep forgetting what the fashion/model industry really is! its not nice, AT ALL...so why do you expect Tyra to cut slack? i think Brooke was just a cute, sweet girl. i didnt see a "top model" at all. the ones you all hate the most, like Anchal and Jaeda...for having a lack of confidence..they really have the looks and height it takes to sell in this industry. i hope Anchal steps it up and wins.the twins are boring and have really bad posture/hunchbacks. also, Eugena is pretty but pimply..BUT with clear skin she has top model looks. so does Jaeda,but ppl say she looks manly..that works in photos %26amp; looks more edgy. caridee is the typical blonde, its boring. period.
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
The truth is that this season is highly debated. Brooke, yes she is a young , pretty girl yet she was sent home. Face it, someone has to go every week. I know it hurts to see your faves go : hush...I am black and I do not think that Jada and Eugena are been kept there because of their color. They show potential but I am just tired of hearing Jada whine about her hair.
Another big night for Melrose, she is not that popular but might just end up winning. And what the hell has gotten to Tyra's head, she seems unnecessarily harsh at times...- chill out girl
Reply:You know, I think they set up some of the girls to go home. You see them taking photos and then they choose one to represent them. How do you know that they are actually choosing the best? I liked brooke, but I really don't care. I would rather that Melrose goes. She's really irritating. I guess that's why she isn't leaving.
Reply:Yes, Brooke was cute and sweet in person, but she was also able to bring a certain depth and soul to her photos that empty-eyed Eugenia and pathetic "Boo-hoo-I-have-short-hair" Jaeda never could, yet they are still around and Brooke is gone. A model needs to be able to take good PHOTOS. Sure, Eugenia and Jaeda are gorgeous, but it takes more than that to make it as a model, as Tyra herself likes to say rather often. If you can't deliver on film, you should go. Brooke delivered. AJ delivered (she was too cool for the cheesy couple photo shot. You could tell she thought it was stupid). Caridee (I disagree with you - she brings a uniqueness and style to her photos that make her more than a typical blonde), Melrose, the twins, and even Anchal deliver, but Eugenia and Jaeda don't, yet they are still on the show. That's what bummed me out. Brooke had far more promise than Jaeda and Eugenia combined. And Anchal? Gorgeous, yes, but completely devoid of confidence. A shame too because she could totally run off with this thing.
Reply:i didn't feel like she had the worst pictures this week. i'd give that to jaeda or eugena. part of working in the industry is being able to be approachable. not saying the person has to be super nice just approachable, and humble. melrose to me has the worst attitude of the girls remaining.
i love tyra, but i do think this season she is a little more into herself. i understand it is a show and they want good tv. i'm just surprised by the way this season has gone so far.
i love anchal but she needs to be confident!
Why do people think Brooke should not have gone home??
The truth is that this season is highly debated. Brooke, yes she is a young , pretty girl yet she was sent home. Face it, someone has to go every week. I know it hurts to see your faves go : hush...I am black and I do not think that Jada and Eugena are been kept there because of their color. They show potential but I am just tired of hearing Jada whine about her hair.
Another big night for Melrose, she is not that popular but might just end up winning. And what the hell has gotten to Tyra's head, she seems unnecessarily harsh at times...- chill out girl
Reply:You know, I think they set up some of the girls to go home. You see them taking photos and then they choose one to represent them. How do you know that they are actually choosing the best? I liked brooke, but I really don't care. I would rather that Melrose goes. She's really irritating. I guess that's why she isn't leaving.
Reply:Yes, Brooke was cute and sweet in person, but she was also able to bring a certain depth and soul to her photos that empty-eyed Eugenia and pathetic "Boo-hoo-I-have-short-hair" Jaeda never could, yet they are still around and Brooke is gone. A model needs to be able to take good PHOTOS. Sure, Eugenia and Jaeda are gorgeous, but it takes more than that to make it as a model, as Tyra herself likes to say rather often. If you can't deliver on film, you should go. Brooke delivered. AJ delivered (she was too cool for the cheesy couple photo shot. You could tell she thought it was stupid). Caridee (I disagree with you - she brings a uniqueness and style to her photos that make her more than a typical blonde), Melrose, the twins, and even Anchal deliver, but Eugenia and Jaeda don't, yet they are still on the show. That's what bummed me out. Brooke had far more promise than Jaeda and Eugenia combined. And Anchal? Gorgeous, yes, but completely devoid of confidence. A shame too because she could totally run off with this thing.
Reply:i didn't feel like she had the worst pictures this week. i'd give that to jaeda or eugena. part of working in the industry is being able to be approachable. not saying the person has to be super nice just approachable, and humble. melrose to me has the worst attitude of the girls remaining.
i love tyra, but i do think this season she is a little more into herself. i understand it is a show and they want good tv. i'm just surprised by the way this season has gone so far.
i love anchal but she needs to be confident!
What Makes A GOod Pop/R&B Artist?
I wanna be a singer, Im 17 Im Black and Have long hair like alicia keys and Im thick and big and I wanna Have the total package but my breast is too big and my body looks to overgrown because when you in the industry there are going to judge you and Im a person who loves fashion and i just don't want to get scrutinize because of what im wearing, i have tough skin but it kills me sometimes to hold it in.., I love R%26amp;B, reggae, pop, soft rock and rap especially jazz. My highest influences in music is Prince im obessed with his style, his music his lifestlye im just in love with him, I have his albums and I would always appreciate what he does I fell in love with him 2 years ago and when i heard his album in my moms music collection i was anxious to listen to it, for many years i never knew that was his album and when i listen to it, it was majic.. I wanna be the Female Prince IM GONNA PROVE THE WORLD I AM A SINGER AND GOD KNOW"S, Im gonna bring positive music in the industry.. trust me..
What Makes A GOod Pop/R%26amp;B Artist?
TALENT TALENT!!!!
If you have big boobs and talent people are gonna start asking questions
Reply:well i think you have to be tough and smart. have a good head for business and know how to promote yourself. then i think most anyone could make it. go for it!
Reply:try out for american idol. even if you don't win its a good way to get some exposure. if you don't want to go that route you know take some singing lessons and get an agent and maybe you could sing at local events for a while, and maybe put your songs on youtube and myspace those are both good ways to get yourself and your music out there. good luck.
Reply:just be yourself
Reply:Prince is my all time favorite also.
About 15-20 years ago Prince had a really talented singer named Bonnie Boyer in his band. She was a heavy set, yet beautiful woman %26amp; had one of the best singing voices ever.
More recently he's worked with Rosie Gaines who also is great singer in her own right.
Image is very important for "pop acts" but I'd much rather see a talented performer %26amp; singer than a hot girl who lip syncs songs she didn't even write.
Prince is a good role model for aspiring singers %26amp; musicians.
He takes his art seriously %26amp; is always at the top of his game. He's versitile in almost all forms of music %26amp; can play almost any instrument you put in front of him.
One thing about Prince that stands out most is that he's got his own style. He's never been one to follow trends - he sets his own.
The most important thing to remember is to stay true to yourself %26amp; your craft.
What Makes A GOod Pop/R%26amp;B Artist?
TALENT TALENT!!!!
If you have big boobs and talent people are gonna start asking questions
Reply:well i think you have to be tough and smart. have a good head for business and know how to promote yourself. then i think most anyone could make it. go for it!
Reply:try out for american idol. even if you don't win its a good way to get some exposure. if you don't want to go that route you know take some singing lessons and get an agent and maybe you could sing at local events for a while, and maybe put your songs on youtube and myspace those are both good ways to get yourself and your music out there. good luck.
Reply:just be yourself
Reply:Prince is my all time favorite also.
About 15-20 years ago Prince had a really talented singer named Bonnie Boyer in his band. She was a heavy set, yet beautiful woman %26amp; had one of the best singing voices ever.
More recently he's worked with Rosie Gaines who also is great singer in her own right.
Image is very important for "pop acts" but I'd much rather see a talented performer %26amp; singer than a hot girl who lip syncs songs she didn't even write.
Prince is a good role model for aspiring singers %26amp; musicians.
He takes his art seriously %26amp; is always at the top of his game. He's versitile in almost all forms of music %26amp; can play almost any instrument you put in front of him.
One thing about Prince that stands out most is that he's got his own style. He's never been one to follow trends - he sets his own.
The most important thing to remember is to stay true to yourself %26amp; your craft.
Who is responsible for "marketing" ultra Slim models?
I have seen it on Entertainment Tonight about a Brazilian model who died from Anorexia and I wanted to ask, who do you think is responsible for making young women in the Fashion industry (and in real life too starve)? I know the general answers are the media. I'm not looking for that or the answer from Society or their peers as well, because as we all know people base their judgements by what they see around them, like general Mass media.
For fashion, my guess goes towards the suspicion of the Gay men who design the outfits and hire the girls in the agencies. From what I have heard from ALL heterosexual men in my life, they don't want a girl to be skin and bones period. It would make it hard to buy a girl a box of chocolates or take her out to dinner and worse the fear she will have complications during pregnancy if she is too thin. I am sorry if I offended Gay men out there, but I think they are (the ones in the industry) are partially responsible, if not a lot responsible for it.
Who is responsible for "marketing" ultra Slim models?
Your comments about gay men in the fashion industry are pretty much right on the mark. These male designers know what kind of the body they like and if you think that many of the models look like 12-yr-old boys, then you are correct.
Reply:It's the fashion industry.It's unrealistic for someone to be a size 0.It may not seem like it but things are slowly changing for the better.
Reply:Ever since Twiggy came on the scene back in the 70s, rail thin models were the standard.
Reply:the responsibility lies with the girls who starve themselves simply to be employable as models. i can advertise all over for someone with the ability to fly, but i cannot be blamed for the idiots who jump off the roof in an effort to prove they can do it. it's all about personal responsibility. we all make our own choices, and i have no sympathy for anyone who refuses to eat and take care of themselves in order to fit another's ideal of beauty. how shallow can one get?
bougainvillea
For fashion, my guess goes towards the suspicion of the Gay men who design the outfits and hire the girls in the agencies. From what I have heard from ALL heterosexual men in my life, they don't want a girl to be skin and bones period. It would make it hard to buy a girl a box of chocolates or take her out to dinner and worse the fear she will have complications during pregnancy if she is too thin. I am sorry if I offended Gay men out there, but I think they are (the ones in the industry) are partially responsible, if not a lot responsible for it.
Who is responsible for "marketing" ultra Slim models?
Your comments about gay men in the fashion industry are pretty much right on the mark. These male designers know what kind of the body they like and if you think that many of the models look like 12-yr-old boys, then you are correct.
Reply:It's the fashion industry.It's unrealistic for someone to be a size 0.It may not seem like it but things are slowly changing for the better.
Reply:Ever since Twiggy came on the scene back in the 70s, rail thin models were the standard.
Reply:the responsibility lies with the girls who starve themselves simply to be employable as models. i can advertise all over for someone with the ability to fly, but i cannot be blamed for the idiots who jump off the roof in an effort to prove they can do it. it's all about personal responsibility. we all make our own choices, and i have no sympathy for anyone who refuses to eat and take care of themselves in order to fit another's ideal of beauty. how shallow can one get?
bougainvillea
Do you believe that sunscreen protects you against cancer or does it cause cancer?
Ok, here it goes guys. The sunscreen industry makes money by selling lotion products that actually contain cancer-causing chemicals. It then donates a portion of that money to the cancer industry through non-profit groups like the American Cancer Society which, in turn, run heart-breaking public service ads urging people to use sunscreen to "prevent cancer."
The scientific evidence, however, shows quite clearly that sunscreen actually promotes cancer by blocking the body's absorption of ultraviolet radiation, which produces vitamin D in the skin. Vitamin D, as recent studies have shown, prevents up to 77 of ALL cancers in women (breast cancer, colon cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, brain tumors, multiple myeloma... you name it). Meanwhile, the toxic chemical ingredients used in most sunscreen products are actually carcinogenic and have never been safety tested or safety approved by the FDA.
What do you think?
Do you believe that sunscreen protects you against cancer or does it cause cancer?
I know Rex !! I'm with you buddy, but it's a veritable minefield out there mate. They write a hieroglyphic version of the nasty sludge contained therein in minuscule print on the back of the bottle or tube and even if you can pronounce it or better still know what it is many people take on board the usual dribble they spout that it's in such minuscule amounts that no harm will be done ~ how many situations can you apply that statement to hey??!! It's about time people simply started to think for themselves and not follow big industry marketing like a bunch of mindless little lambs trailing off to the slaughter in my opinion.
♥you can actually buy herbal varieties of sunscreen , i simply avoid prolonged exposure and peak sun times during the day and cover up properly with a decent hat (like my hat??!!) and loose protective clothing............ geez, i don't want to get wrinkly and dry before i have to♥
Perphaps everybody needs to just a use a lot more sun sense and cover up, wear a hat and avoid the cruel and harsh rays of the midday sun !! So ridiculous you know, when i was a teenager in high school ............. ooooh, all those years ago ............... i got picked on mercilessly for my olive skin and wild dark curly hair!! These days, people are literally dying to get the same color skin and are racing off to the hairdresser eager to pump toxic sludge into their hair to perm it !! makes utterly no sense to me .............. totally brainless i reckon.
What's with people's obsession for the ultimate tan anyways?? whatever happened to that rosy glow of health and vitality anyways!!
Saddest part is that you really can't tell people, they have to learn for themselves............. all we can is just keep swinging our banners buddy.
good health to you %26amp; yours mate♥
CHEERS
♥
Reply:No worries !!
CHEERS Report It
Reply:Oh, forgot to add something .......... did you know that after a suntan is established, vitamin ~ D production through the skin stops??!! Soooooo, its only the feel good factor you get from the sun after that i guess... :0) Report It
Reply:Conspiracy. . .but sunscreen does help prevent cancer, there are many sources saying so and I've even done an experiment testing it. ..
Reply:ya i think sun can cause a cancer
Reply:OK, I can see your point. BUT if you see someone die of melanoma you change your mind!! It is a horrible condition, and the human body can make all the vitamin D it needs in just 10 minutes of sun exposure. It has also resently been found that vitamin D helps to prevent heart attack and also rickets, so people have to be sensible. Caking yourself constantly in total sunblock obviously isn't a great idea, but you have to stop yourself from burning, it is burning the skin that causes melanoma. If you know you are going to be out all day, you could take a vitamin D tablet and slap on the sunscreen, honestly, you don't want melanoma, my dad died of that and it is horrible. There is no treatment, other than surgery and you end up with cancer all over your body as it travels through the lymph system. He died slowly in terrible pain. So I say, slap on the sunscreen if you are going out in the sun, take a vitamin D supliment, and try to get your 10 minutes everyday if you can, let the rest take care of it's self.
Reply:if you use the right SPF then it would be ok. But if you use more than what you want then the problem will start since higher SPF will not release the UV absorbed from the sun since sunscreen can't block the UV 100%.
Reply:The sun causes cancer in some people with prolonged exposure. Sun screen protects you against this. The big hole in your conspiracy theory is that there was sun screen to prevent burns before there was the claim that it helped with preventing cancer.
Reply:Listen to Minx - Naturopath in training.
If all the arguments about the sun causing skin cancer were true, then why is it that the further you get from the equator the higher the incidence rate of skin cancer.
People accept advertising (programming) as the truth and ridicule facts that don't align with what they believe.
Be aware, think for yourself and take control of your own health!
The scientific evidence, however, shows quite clearly that sunscreen actually promotes cancer by blocking the body's absorption of ultraviolet radiation, which produces vitamin D in the skin. Vitamin D, as recent studies have shown, prevents up to 77 of ALL cancers in women (breast cancer, colon cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, brain tumors, multiple myeloma... you name it). Meanwhile, the toxic chemical ingredients used in most sunscreen products are actually carcinogenic and have never been safety tested or safety approved by the FDA.
What do you think?
Do you believe that sunscreen protects you against cancer or does it cause cancer?
I know Rex !! I'm with you buddy, but it's a veritable minefield out there mate. They write a hieroglyphic version of the nasty sludge contained therein in minuscule print on the back of the bottle or tube and even if you can pronounce it or better still know what it is many people take on board the usual dribble they spout that it's in such minuscule amounts that no harm will be done ~ how many situations can you apply that statement to hey??!! It's about time people simply started to think for themselves and not follow big industry marketing like a bunch of mindless little lambs trailing off to the slaughter in my opinion.
♥you can actually buy herbal varieties of sunscreen , i simply avoid prolonged exposure and peak sun times during the day and cover up properly with a decent hat (like my hat??!!) and loose protective clothing............ geez, i don't want to get wrinkly and dry before i have to♥
Perphaps everybody needs to just a use a lot more sun sense and cover up, wear a hat and avoid the cruel and harsh rays of the midday sun !! So ridiculous you know, when i was a teenager in high school ............. ooooh, all those years ago ............... i got picked on mercilessly for my olive skin and wild dark curly hair!! These days, people are literally dying to get the same color skin and are racing off to the hairdresser eager to pump toxic sludge into their hair to perm it !! makes utterly no sense to me .............. totally brainless i reckon.
What's with people's obsession for the ultimate tan anyways?? whatever happened to that rosy glow of health and vitality anyways!!
Saddest part is that you really can't tell people, they have to learn for themselves............. all we can is just keep swinging our banners buddy.
good health to you %26amp; yours mate♥
CHEERS
♥
Reply:No worries !!
CHEERS Report It
Reply:Oh, forgot to add something .......... did you know that after a suntan is established, vitamin ~ D production through the skin stops??!! Soooooo, its only the feel good factor you get from the sun after that i guess... :0) Report It
Reply:Conspiracy. . .but sunscreen does help prevent cancer, there are many sources saying so and I've even done an experiment testing it. ..
Reply:ya i think sun can cause a cancer
Reply:OK, I can see your point. BUT if you see someone die of melanoma you change your mind!! It is a horrible condition, and the human body can make all the vitamin D it needs in just 10 minutes of sun exposure. It has also resently been found that vitamin D helps to prevent heart attack and also rickets, so people have to be sensible. Caking yourself constantly in total sunblock obviously isn't a great idea, but you have to stop yourself from burning, it is burning the skin that causes melanoma. If you know you are going to be out all day, you could take a vitamin D tablet and slap on the sunscreen, honestly, you don't want melanoma, my dad died of that and it is horrible. There is no treatment, other than surgery and you end up with cancer all over your body as it travels through the lymph system. He died slowly in terrible pain. So I say, slap on the sunscreen if you are going out in the sun, take a vitamin D supliment, and try to get your 10 minutes everyday if you can, let the rest take care of it's self.
Reply:if you use the right SPF then it would be ok. But if you use more than what you want then the problem will start since higher SPF will not release the UV absorbed from the sun since sunscreen can't block the UV 100%.
Reply:The sun causes cancer in some people with prolonged exposure. Sun screen protects you against this. The big hole in your conspiracy theory is that there was sun screen to prevent burns before there was the claim that it helped with preventing cancer.
Reply:Listen to Minx - Naturopath in training.
If all the arguments about the sun causing skin cancer were true, then why is it that the further you get from the equator the higher the incidence rate of skin cancer.
People accept advertising (programming) as the truth and ridicule facts that don't align with what they believe.
Be aware, think for yourself and take control of your own health!
Do you agree with VANITY FAIR MAGAZINEs Top 100........?
If you think that the United States is run by a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite, think again. The reality is very much otherwise, according to an old-line American magazine that did, indeed, once rank as a voice of the so-called “WASP” establishment.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
Do you agree with VANITY FAIR MAGAZINEs Top 100........?
Wow, you deserve a star just for taking your time to type this question. Unless of course you copied and pasted it, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Reply:?
Reply:That was too long for my liking so i am just going to say "yes"and hope that answers your question
Reply:And your point is?
Reply:re your following points listed below
If you think that the United States is run by a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite, think again. The reality is very much otherwise, according to an old-line American magazine that did, indeed, once rank as a voice of the so-called “WASP” establishment.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
My answer is NO, i dont agree with it.
Reply:As Journey says in their classic song "Don't Stop Believing"
"It goes on %26amp; on %26amp; on"
Reply:so-it makes a change from the holocaust!
don't forget the history of the jewish people who have always been persecuted (mainly because of their belief in one god -therefore isolating them )has been with them for centuries-they are good at banking because one reason is usury was forbidden for christians but not for jews therefore they were given the job in medieval times to collect the Kings money etc
they all stick together which is not a bad thing-maybe we should all stick together as human beings then the world might be a better place-don't agree with the suggestion of vanity fair
Reply:This is nothing new to learn. It might be to you. The Jewish people have made a lot of money and have a lot of influence in several spheres of life in the world not just the U.S.A.
This is balanced by other very rich people of other ethnic origins who also have a lot of influence in life. I am sure a list could be done on these people as well.
I am not sure what yr question is about, because then you go on a very long-winded journey to make a point about Jews, so you are obviously asking a question to make a point or comment.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
Do you agree with VANITY FAIR MAGAZINEs Top 100........?
Wow, you deserve a star just for taking your time to type this question. Unless of course you copied and pasted it, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Reply:?
Reply:That was too long for my liking so i am just going to say "yes"and hope that answers your question
Reply:And your point is?
Reply:re your following points listed below
If you think that the United States is run by a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite, think again. The reality is very much otherwise, according to an old-line American magazine that did, indeed, once rank as a voice of the so-called “WASP” establishment.
Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.
So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.
The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.
Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).
Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)
Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.
Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.
Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.
Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.
Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.
Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.
Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.
Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.
And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.
It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”
My answer is NO, i dont agree with it.
Reply:As Journey says in their classic song "Don't Stop Believing"
"It goes on %26amp; on %26amp; on"
Reply:so-it makes a change from the holocaust!
don't forget the history of the jewish people who have always been persecuted (mainly because of their belief in one god -therefore isolating them )has been with them for centuries-they are good at banking because one reason is usury was forbidden for christians but not for jews therefore they were given the job in medieval times to collect the Kings money etc
they all stick together which is not a bad thing-maybe we should all stick together as human beings then the world might be a better place-don't agree with the suggestion of vanity fair
Reply:This is nothing new to learn. It might be to you. The Jewish people have made a lot of money and have a lot of influence in several spheres of life in the world not just the U.S.A.
This is balanced by other very rich people of other ethnic origins who also have a lot of influence in life. I am sure a list could be done on these people as well.
I am not sure what yr question is about, because then you go on a very long-winded journey to make a point about Jews, so you are obviously asking a question to make a point or comment.
Bollywood?
Please tell me everything you can about Indian cinema especially Hindi CInema (Bollywood.) My specific question asks why fair skin is so prevalent in Indian movies. Also, don't you think the name "Bollywood" is a terribly poor name to call the film industry? It sounds like it's copying Hollywood. Why don't they start calling it Mollywood since Bombay's name change? Why don't they even call it The Mumbai Film Industry because that is what Hollywood does? Anyway, I just want to know everything about Indian cinema from plagiarism to change in costumes. Thanks!
Bollywood?
Bollywood (india), Mollywood (bengali), Lollywood (pakistan), etc ,etc, - boring
British ruled india for a long time, their culture and ethnocentric views shaped the current beliefs of the asians there. White color is better, the whiter you are the "prettier" you are. So fair skin ppl get more opportunities in society, be it in movies, wedding proposals, job prospects, etc.
Indian movie industry is the biggest in the world. They churn out quit a LOT of movies in a year, 1/2 not worth seeing at all. They focus more on quantity then quality apparently. There is also LOT of plagiarism, every move is almost a copy of american movies. The God-Father is copied word for word and action/imitation per action so much that it's sickening to see it. Also, They recently got sued for copying Will Smith's "Hitch" movie so i think american movie industry is starting to fight back now against this plagiarisms.
The theme is almost the same in every single movie. girl falls in love with guy, girl parents disapprove, big fight, girl-guy end up together at end, happy ending. They also starting to copy US industry now in making Muslims as the bad guys in the movies, something you would never see 5-10yrs ago.
Reply:hi.....i think i can answe some of ur questions(though not all!).......firstly,i think that fair skin is prevalent in bollywood because this industry is basically dominated by the north india,so it is obvious dat the fairer ppl would be given more preference......and as regards plagiarism let me tell you that this concept is quite new to industry since it is only recently dat bollywood has started copying from other movies(mainly from movies of the west,south india,bengal,etc.).this might be because the directors might have run out of ideas!!....but this was not the case earlier when film makers were more creative %26amp; had less of the copying mentality.as for da costumes, they have become more westernised(%26amp; vulgur!) since da past few decades as bollywood is desperately tryin 2 copy hollywood in terms of costumes.one advantage of bein part of da bollywood is dat one is paid huge amount of money! however,da acting skills of actors has not really undergone a change as they r focusing only on looks(%26amp; exposure!)instead of acting!.........i think dat wud be enopugh %26amp; if u wanna know more thn just mail me......hope this info helps u.....bye.
Reply:just wait India will have its own playboy magazine call (karmasutra) or playman.
Reply:First thing u need to know is 70% or more films are financed by The Dons of Dubai. I'm sure you've heard of Dawood Ibrahim.
All the films must contain a lot of songs in it.
The industry is a mail dominated one.
Cold wars are common between stars.
Actors are mostly overpaid.
Unfortunately Shahrukh Khan who knows nothing of acting is called the Kng of Bollywood.
He is as stupid as the name Bollywood.
Though the singers play a very important role but they still don't get the attention they deserve.
Reply:Bollywood is known as the Indian film Industry. It's the LARGEST film industry in the entire world. Each year, they produce a massive amount of movies.
Alot of stars are'nt dark, they have very light brown skin.
Bollywood was given to them by the western media(hollywood), and some of the stars do not like the word, and get offended when they are called Bollywood actors. They say it's a way of mocking them. Nobody has talked about changing the name of Bollywood yet.
If you mean that the Indian Cinema has plagiarism, then it does'nt! If you think they copy movies from Hollywood, they don't! The clothing they wear in movies depends on the movie itself. Of course you will see the traditional indian outfits such as saris being worn. Over the years, the fashion has changed just like any where else.
Now, to go into more detail, there are 2 top of the line actors here in bollywood, and they're both major, global superstars!
They are Shahrukh Khan and Amitabh Bachan. Perhaps you've heard of them. Shahrukh Khan is known as the King of Bollywood because in MY opinion, I think he's the BEST actor in the entire world!! Amitabh Bachan is an older actor and has been around in movies for a long time! Shahrukh is known as India's brand embassador. They're both known throughout the world and have an enormous number of fans. Shahrukh Khan has OVER 3.5 BILLION fans worldwide. (yes, it's true!) And Amitabh, i don't know how many he has. Then, there's a really famous indian film director whose movies have all been super hits. They include Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Khabi Khushi Khabi Gham, Kal Ho Naa Ho, and Khabi Alveida Naa Kehena. His name is Karan Johar. One of the very famous fashion designers is Manish Malhotra.
Well, hope this helps!!!
Reply:http://www.thebillu.com
World Biggest entertainment protal
http://www.thebillu.com
Songs
Videos
Wallpapers
Movies
Radio
TV Chennals
Cricket
Go http://www.thebillu.com
Reply:Om Puri and Naseer have both been critics of calling Indian movies 'Bollywood'.....My response would be 'Whats in a name?" Got to call it something, don't we? Or we could just call it 'Movies formerly known as Bollywood'.
Regardless, if Bollywood movies is your thing, then there is only one site that will satiate your appetite:
www.interval.in - India's premier movie portal
Relax, take a break at Interval.in
Enjoy!
Bollywood?
Bollywood (india), Mollywood (bengali), Lollywood (pakistan), etc ,etc, - boring
British ruled india for a long time, their culture and ethnocentric views shaped the current beliefs of the asians there. White color is better, the whiter you are the "prettier" you are. So fair skin ppl get more opportunities in society, be it in movies, wedding proposals, job prospects, etc.
Indian movie industry is the biggest in the world. They churn out quit a LOT of movies in a year, 1/2 not worth seeing at all. They focus more on quantity then quality apparently. There is also LOT of plagiarism, every move is almost a copy of american movies. The God-Father is copied word for word and action/imitation per action so much that it's sickening to see it. Also, They recently got sued for copying Will Smith's "Hitch" movie so i think american movie industry is starting to fight back now against this plagiarisms.
The theme is almost the same in every single movie. girl falls in love with guy, girl parents disapprove, big fight, girl-guy end up together at end, happy ending. They also starting to copy US industry now in making Muslims as the bad guys in the movies, something you would never see 5-10yrs ago.
Reply:hi.....i think i can answe some of ur questions(though not all!).......firstly,i think that fair skin is prevalent in bollywood because this industry is basically dominated by the north india,so it is obvious dat the fairer ppl would be given more preference......and as regards plagiarism let me tell you that this concept is quite new to industry since it is only recently dat bollywood has started copying from other movies(mainly from movies of the west,south india,bengal,etc.).this might be because the directors might have run out of ideas!!....but this was not the case earlier when film makers were more creative %26amp; had less of the copying mentality.as for da costumes, they have become more westernised(%26amp; vulgur!) since da past few decades as bollywood is desperately tryin 2 copy hollywood in terms of costumes.one advantage of bein part of da bollywood is dat one is paid huge amount of money! however,da acting skills of actors has not really undergone a change as they r focusing only on looks(%26amp; exposure!)instead of acting!.........i think dat wud be enopugh %26amp; if u wanna know more thn just mail me......hope this info helps u.....bye.
Reply:just wait India will have its own playboy magazine call (karmasutra) or playman.
Reply:First thing u need to know is 70% or more films are financed by The Dons of Dubai. I'm sure you've heard of Dawood Ibrahim.
All the films must contain a lot of songs in it.
The industry is a mail dominated one.
Cold wars are common between stars.
Actors are mostly overpaid.
Unfortunately Shahrukh Khan who knows nothing of acting is called the Kng of Bollywood.
He is as stupid as the name Bollywood.
Though the singers play a very important role but they still don't get the attention they deserve.
Reply:Bollywood is known as the Indian film Industry. It's the LARGEST film industry in the entire world. Each year, they produce a massive amount of movies.
Alot of stars are'nt dark, they have very light brown skin.
Bollywood was given to them by the western media(hollywood), and some of the stars do not like the word, and get offended when they are called Bollywood actors. They say it's a way of mocking them. Nobody has talked about changing the name of Bollywood yet.
If you mean that the Indian Cinema has plagiarism, then it does'nt! If you think they copy movies from Hollywood, they don't! The clothing they wear in movies depends on the movie itself. Of course you will see the traditional indian outfits such as saris being worn. Over the years, the fashion has changed just like any where else.
Now, to go into more detail, there are 2 top of the line actors here in bollywood, and they're both major, global superstars!
They are Shahrukh Khan and Amitabh Bachan. Perhaps you've heard of them. Shahrukh Khan is known as the King of Bollywood because in MY opinion, I think he's the BEST actor in the entire world!! Amitabh Bachan is an older actor and has been around in movies for a long time! Shahrukh is known as India's brand embassador. They're both known throughout the world and have an enormous number of fans. Shahrukh Khan has OVER 3.5 BILLION fans worldwide. (yes, it's true!) And Amitabh, i don't know how many he has. Then, there's a really famous indian film director whose movies have all been super hits. They include Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Khabi Khushi Khabi Gham, Kal Ho Naa Ho, and Khabi Alveida Naa Kehena. His name is Karan Johar. One of the very famous fashion designers is Manish Malhotra.
Well, hope this helps!!!
Reply:http://www.thebillu.com
World Biggest entertainment protal
http://www.thebillu.com
Songs
Videos
Wallpapers
Movies
Radio
TV Chennals
Cricket
Go http://www.thebillu.com
Reply:Om Puri and Naseer have both been critics of calling Indian movies 'Bollywood'.....My response would be 'Whats in a name?" Got to call it something, don't we? Or we could just call it 'Movies formerly known as Bollywood'.
Regardless, if Bollywood movies is your thing, then there is only one site that will satiate your appetite:
www.interval.in - India's premier movie portal
Relax, take a break at Interval.in
Enjoy!
How to stop alive skinin to fur farms?
J watch hiden camera videos from China in fur farm.People there take skin from animals when they alive!It is very disturbing when you see how much they suffering!!!
What can we as a human do to stop this?If nobody can stop fur industry to killing that poor animals,we must do something to kill them first before thake them skin.. is so wrong anyway.. :(
Can we help?
How to stop alive skinin to fur farms?
Unfortunately, these horrendous acts are out of our control.
The one thing you can do is locate merchants who purchase furs from these farms and notify them that you do not approve of these actions.
Submit their names to animal rights organizations, such as PETA. Write to the government officials in the states where they are located. (The merchants who purchase from the farms.)
Inform their consumers where they get their furs. (although, if you are wearing fur you probably dont care anyway.)
In short, the only way to lessen these horrendous acts is to take away the consumers of the product.
Thanks for caring!
Mavin
Reply:fortunately, we are not powerless. you can go on to Peta2.com and they email you when you when they find fur farms and u can email the owner to stop fur trade. IT WORKS!!!!! so go to Peta2.com and take part in the end of unexplainable cruel acts of selfishness. Report It
Reply::(((((((( omg i love cats and i would neva do anything to hurt them i neva even new they did that i dnt think there is anything we can do personally i agree with you when you say its very disturbing!!!!
shell flower
What can we as a human do to stop this?If nobody can stop fur industry to killing that poor animals,we must do something to kill them first before thake them skin.. is so wrong anyway.. :(
Can we help?
How to stop alive skinin to fur farms?
Unfortunately, these horrendous acts are out of our control.
The one thing you can do is locate merchants who purchase furs from these farms and notify them that you do not approve of these actions.
Submit their names to animal rights organizations, such as PETA. Write to the government officials in the states where they are located. (The merchants who purchase from the farms.)
Inform their consumers where they get their furs. (although, if you are wearing fur you probably dont care anyway.)
In short, the only way to lessen these horrendous acts is to take away the consumers of the product.
Thanks for caring!
Mavin
Reply:fortunately, we are not powerless. you can go on to Peta2.com and they email you when you when they find fur farms and u can email the owner to stop fur trade. IT WORKS!!!!! so go to Peta2.com and take part in the end of unexplainable cruel acts of selfishness. Report It
Reply::(((((((( omg i love cats and i would neva do anything to hurt them i neva even new they did that i dnt think there is anything we can do personally i agree with you when you say its very disturbing!!!!
shell flower
Career advice -Tv and film?
I've been trying to get work in the props or art dept within the Tv and Film Industry for over 5 years now. I have a fine Art degree and have been a pro photographer, I've gone through all the usuall channels, Offered to volunteer etc... There is always something against me. I'm 31 now and feel extremely frustrated at not getting anywhere... I'm beginning to think it is who you know. I'm trying to branch out with screen writing and have a great Idea for a tv drama - but not too sure how to go about it - like who to approach who to trust etc...
The other problem that is really getting me down is opportunities for ethnic minorities within the industry. I understand the whole positive discrimination thing ; But what happened to talent getting you the job or training scheme -and not origins or skin colour.
My hands are tied with this situation and as a white working class man from a northern town I have to say that the country is failing people like me. Any advise? Suggestions? - Sensible
Career advice -Tv and film?
give it up, try to find a job elsewhere. it sounds like youve wasted enough time at this pipe dream. if you dont now your gona be a bum the rest of your life.
Reply:pray on it. Whats meant to be will be. Everything happens for a reason you get a lesson and a blessing out of everything that happens to you in life. This could just be a learning experience for you while you're on your way to the top. Good luck and if you need an actor look me up.
Reply:ch5 have launched a new talent thingy, i don't know too much about it but from what i gather you send off your work in the hope that they accept it and produce it. i am sure you will get all the information you need from the channels website (also the BBC accept work from unknown artists and sometimes they will produce it, again try their website).
i have read the other replies and i don't think that you should give up on your dream, keep at it.
good luck :)
ps. make sure you copywrite your ideas if you are worried.
Reply:you could try eastender sorry (deadender) or the bill. they will employ anyone. even those who cant act.
The other problem that is really getting me down is opportunities for ethnic minorities within the industry. I understand the whole positive discrimination thing ; But what happened to talent getting you the job or training scheme -and not origins or skin colour.
My hands are tied with this situation and as a white working class man from a northern town I have to say that the country is failing people like me. Any advise? Suggestions? - Sensible
Career advice -Tv and film?
give it up, try to find a job elsewhere. it sounds like youve wasted enough time at this pipe dream. if you dont now your gona be a bum the rest of your life.
Reply:pray on it. Whats meant to be will be. Everything happens for a reason you get a lesson and a blessing out of everything that happens to you in life. This could just be a learning experience for you while you're on your way to the top. Good luck and if you need an actor look me up.
Reply:ch5 have launched a new talent thingy, i don't know too much about it but from what i gather you send off your work in the hope that they accept it and produce it. i am sure you will get all the information you need from the channels website (also the BBC accept work from unknown artists and sometimes they will produce it, again try their website).
i have read the other replies and i don't think that you should give up on your dream, keep at it.
good luck :)
ps. make sure you copywrite your ideas if you are worried.
Reply:you could try eastender sorry (deadender) or the bill. they will employ anyone. even those who cant act.
A 90% Cancer Cure Diet using Flaxseed Oil & Cottage Cheese?
Dr Johanna Budwig diet
Cancer, Arthritis, Multiple sclerosis, Psoriasis, Eczema, Acne, ...
Flaxseed oil and cottage cheese
Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient combination actually prevents and cures cancer!
--------------------------------------...
HOME - The Cancer Homepage
--------------------------------------...
Read Flaxseed oil Testimonials :
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158...
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158...
--------------------------------------...
Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient
combination actually prevents and helps body to cure cancer!
by Robert Willner, M.D.,Ph.D.
(author of "The Cancer Solution").
--------------------------------------...
Dr.Johanna Budwig Mix:
Put in your blender:
1 cup Organic cottage cheese (low fat, not too hard one, best make your own)(or yogurt)
2-5 Tbsp. of flaxseeed oil-
1-3 Tbsp. of freshly ground up flaxseed (coffee grinder ($15) works fine)
enough water to make it soft
little cayenne
optional:
little garlic
little red pepper
little champagne
Make it very soft.
Eat some of it every day.
(PS Adjust quantities for your taste !)
--------------------------------------...
THE BUDWIG FLAX OIL DIET
The Flaxseed (Linseed) oil diet was originally proposed by Dr. Johanna Budwig, a german biochemist and expert on fats and oils, in 1951 and recently re-examined by Dr. Dan C. Roehm M.D. FACP (Oncologist and former cardiologist) in 1990. Dr. Roehm claims: "this diet is far and away the most successful anti-cancer diet in the world".
Budwig claims that the diet is both a preventative and a curative. She says the absence of linol-acids [in the average western diet] is responsible for the production of oxydase, which induces cancer growth and is the cause of many other chronic disorders.
The beneficial oxydase ferments are destroyed by heating or boiling oils in foods, and by nitrates used for preserving meat, etc.
The theory is: the use of oxygen in the organism can be stimulated by protein compounds of sulphuric content, which make oils water-soluble and which is present in cheese, nuts, onion and leek vegetables such as leek, chive, onion and garlic, but especially cottage cheese.
Ferments of cell respiration closely connected with the highly unsaturated fatty acids, are also needed for proper oxydation. It is essential to use only unrefined, cold-pressed oils with high linolic acid content, such as linseed, sunflower, soya, poppyseed, walnut, and corn oils. Such oil should be consumed together with foods containing the right proteins otherwise the oils will have the OPPOSITE EFFECT, causing more harm than good.
The best combination is cottage cheese and linseed oil. The linseed should be freshly ground. Carbohydrates containing natural sugar, such as dates, figs, pears, apples and grapes, are also included in the diet. Honey is also beneficial. Most of the synthetic vitamin A preparations are bad because they contain oxidation products, but much carotine as provitamin A (from carrot) is consumed. Vitamin B from buttermilk, yoghurt, and natural yeast is beneficial.
A person requires daily about 4 oz. of cottage cheese mixed well with 1.5 oz. of linseed oil and 1 oz. of milk. A blender or egg beater works fine. The mixture an be sweeten with honey or otherwise flavoured naturally. Fresh fruits can be added. Every morning 2 spoonfuls of freshly ground linseed oil should be taken in luke warm buttermilk or yoghurt.
The diet is indicated for all kinds of chronic diseases, especially heart ailments (corony thrombosis), gall disorders, diabetes, arthritis, and malignancies. It improves failing hearing and sight. It is the ideal nutrient for children and infants. It is suggested that this diet be supplemented with lactic acid ferments (4).
"What she (Dr. Johanna Budwig) has demonstrated to my initial disbelief but lately, to my complete satisfaction in my practice is: CANCER IS EASILY CURABLE, the treatment is dietary/lifestyle, the response is immediate; the cancer cell is weak and vulnerable; the precise biochemical breakdown point was identified by her in 1951 and is specifically correctable, in vitro (test-tube) as well as in vivo (real)... " (Roehm, "Townsend Letter for Doctors", July 1990)
GENERAL RULES
The patient has no nourishment on day ..1 other than 250 ml (8.5 oz) of Flax Oil with honey plus freshly squeezed fruit juices (no sugar added!). In the case of a very ill person, champagne may be added on the first day in place of juice and is taken with the Flax Oil and honey. Champagne is easily absorbable and has a serious purpose here.
1) SUGAR IS ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN. Grape juice may be added to sweeten any other freshly squeezed juices.
2) Other 'forbiddens' are:
- All animal fats.
- All Salad Oils (this included commercial mayonnaise)
- All Meats (chemicals %26amp; hormones)
- Butter
- Margarine
- Preserved Meats (the preservatives block metabolism even of Flax Oil)
3) Freshly squeezed vegetable juices are fine - carrot, celery, apple, and red beet.
4) Three times daily a warm tea is essential - peppermint, rose hips or grape tea - all sweetened as desired with honey. One cup of black tea before noon is fine.
DAILY PLAN
Before breakfast - a glass of Acidophilus milk or Sauerkraut juice is taken.
Breakfast - Muesli (regular cereal) is overlaid with 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Flax Oil and honey and fresh fruit according to season - berries, cherries, apricots, peaches, grated apple. Vary the flavour from day to day. Use any nuts except peanuts! Herbal teas as desired or black tea. A 4 oz (120 g) serving of THE SPREAD (directions below). This is fine to eat 'straight' like a custard, or add it to other foods taken in the day as you will see.
Morning tea (10am) - A glass of fresh carrot juice, apple, celery, or beet-apple juice is taken.
Lunch - Raw salad with yoghurt-Flax Oil Mayonnaise (directions below).
In addition to 'greens' salads, use grated turnips, carrots, kohlrabi, radishes, sauerkraut or cauliflower. A fine powder of horseradish, chives or parsley may be added for flavour.
Cooked Meal Course - Steamed vegetables, potatoes, or such grains as rice, buck-wheat or millet may be served. to these add either THE SPREAD or THE MAYO - for flavour and to up your intake of Flax Oil. Also mix THE SPREAD with potatoes for an especially hearty meal. Add caraway, chives, parsley or other herbs.
Dessert - Mix fresh fruit other than those used for breakfast with THE SPREAD, this time (instead of honey), flavoured using cream of lemon, vanilla or berries.
Afternoon Tea (4pm) - A small glass of natural wine (no preservatives) or champagne or fresh fruit juice with 1-2 tablespoons of honey-coated Fax Seeds.
Supper - Have this early, at 6pm. Make a hot meal using buckwheat, oat or soy cakes. grits from buckwheat are the very best and can be placed in a vegetable soup, or in a more solid form of cakes with herbal sauce. Sweet sauces %26amp; soups can always be given far more healing energy by adding THE SPREAD. Only honey or grape juice can be used for sweeteners. NO white sugar (or brown!) Only freshly squeezed juices and NOT reconstituted juices (preservative danger) may be used. These must be completely natural.
How to prepare 'THE SPREAD'
Place 250 ml (8.5 oz) Flax Oil into a mixer bowl and add one pound (450 g) of 1 ottage Cheese (ie low fat eg Quark) and add 4 tablespoons (60 ml) of Honey. Turn on the mixer and add just enough low fat milk or water to get the contents of the bowl to blend in together. In 5 minutes, a preparation of custard consistency results that has NO taste of the oil (and no oily 'ring' should be seen when you rinse out the bowl).
Alternatively, you can use Yoghurt instead of Cottage Cheese in proportions of 1 oz (30 g) of Yoghurt to 1 tablespoon (15 ml) each of Flax Oil and of honey and blend as above.
NOTE: When Flax Oil is blended like this, it does not cause diarrhoea even when given in large amounts. It reacts chemically with the (sulphur) proteins of the cottage cheese, yoghurt, etc.
How to prepare 'THE MAYO' (Mayonnaise):
Mix together 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Flax Oil, 2 tablespoons (30 ml) milk, and 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Yoghurt.
Then add 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Lemon juice (or Apple Cider Vinegar) and add 1 teaspoon (2.5g) Mustard plus some herbs such as marjoram or dill.
Next add 2 or 3 slices of health food store pickles (no preservatives! - read label!) and a pinch of herbal salts.
(The above mayonnaise plus lots of mustard and a few bananas is very tasty!)
Concluding remarks by Dr. Roehm - "I only wish that all my patients had a PhD in Biochemistry and Quantum Physics to enable them to see how with such consummate skill this diet was put together. It is a wonder. The champagne vehicle IS easier to assimilate and get someone almost on their death-bed going again. A retention enema of 250 ml (8.5 oz) of oil is another route to get this precious life-furthering, ELECTRON-RICH oil into the body. It can also be applied to the skin for transdermal
absorption. I'll answer your questions and give you "special orders" for you particular case.
You will have to remain on this diet for a good 5 years, at which time your tumour may have disappeared. Persons who break the rules of this diet, Dr Budwig reports, (ie eating preserved meats, candy, etc) will sometimes grow rapidly worse and cannot be saved after they come back from their spree (bon-bons mean bye-bye).
In 1967, Dr Budwig broadcast the following sentence during an interview over the South German Radio Network, describing her incoming patients with failed operations and x-ray therapy":
"Even in these cases it is possible to restore health in a few months at most, I would truly say 90f the time".
"This has never been contradicted, but this knowledge has been a long time reaching this side of the ocean, hasn't it? Cancer treatment can be very simple and very successful once you know how. The cancer interests dont want you to know this.
May those of you who have suffered from this disease (and I include your family and friends in this) forgive the miscreants who have kept this simple information from reaching you for so long".
(signed) Dan C. Roehm, M.D. FACP
--------------------------------------...
"The best, purest, most carefully prepared Flax Oil in America is, in my opinion", said Roehm, "is Omegaflo. Arrowhead mills label is most often seen in Florida (USA). Look for the Omegaflo".
"FLAX (LINSEED) OIL is readily denatured by oxygen, heat, and light. That's why it is used in paint. Rancid oil is bad for health, so oil MUST be carefully produced, packed under nitrogen in light-proof
containers, refrigerated until used, used as fresh as possible, and stabilised with protein (THE SPREAD, etc) promptly once the container is opened..."
Flax Seeds may also be used. Seeds need only be cracked in a food blender, or they may be ground in a coffee grinder. One needs three times the amount of seed to get the oil equivalent. Seeds are high in calories, so one may gain weight. The seeds are also high in soluble fibre, so blending with liquid tends to produce ever-hardening "jellies". Fresh-cracked seed sprinkled on muesli %26amp; eaten promptly
tastes great.
-------
Ed McCabe (p85, "Oxygen Therapies") discusses his point of view on
essential fatty acids:
"The red blood cells in the lungs give up carbon dioxide and take on oxygen. They are then transported to the cell site via the blood vessels, where, they release their oxygen into the plasma. This released oxygen is "attracted" to the cells by the "resonance" of the pi-electron" oxidation-enhancing fatty acids. Otherwise, oxygen cannot work its way into the cell. "Electron rich fatty acids" play the decisive role in "respiratory enzymes, which are the basis of cell oxidation...".
"Dont eat anything hydrogenated like (like margarine, or fried foods) as it defeats oxygenation. Avoid products that say "hydrogenated".
"We should eat essential polyunsaturated fatty acids to enhance oxygenation. They can be found naturally in Carotene, Saffron, and Flaxseed oil."
REFERENCES
1. "Promotion and Prevention of Tumour Growth Effects of Endotoxin, Inflamation, and Dietary Lipids", by Raymond Kearney, Ph.D, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. 2006 Australia. International Clinical Nutrition Review, October, 1987 Vol.
7, No. 4.
2. Roehm, "Townsend Letter for Doctors", July 1990
3. Ed McCabe, "Oxygen Therapies"
4. "The natural way to better health and longer life", Bullivant.
5. Arlin J. Brown, "March of Truth On Cancer", (seventh edition). Summary of 79 nontoxic cancer treatments. Available from the Arlin J. Brown Information Centre Inc., P.O. Box 251, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060. Ph: 1-703-752-9511.
--------------------------------------...
Who is Dr. Johanna Budwig?
Dr. Johanna Budwig is known and highly respected around the world as Germany's premier biochemist. In addition, Dr. Budwig holds a Ph.D. in Natural Science, has undergone medical training, and was schooled in pharmaceutical science, physics, botany and biology. In all courses, this brilliant scientist excelled.
She is best known for her extensive research on the properties and benefits of flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins in the diet, and over the years has published a number of books on the subject, including "Cancer--A Fat Problem," "The Death of the Tumor," and "True Health Against Arteriosclerosis, Heart Infarction %26amp; Cancer."
Dr. Budwig has assisted many seriously ill individuals, even those given up as terminal by orthodox medical practitioners, to regain their health through a simple regimen of nutrition. The basis of Dr. Budwig's program is the use of flaxseed oil blended with low-fat cottage cheese.
In the mid 1950's, Dr. Budwig began her long and meticulous research on the importance of essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic) in the diet. Her subsequent discoveries and announcements sparked mixed reactions. While the general public was eager for this astounding information, German manufacturers of commercial dietary fats (margarine, hard shortening, vegetable oils) went to extremes to prevent her from publishing her findings. Fortunately, while Dr. Budwig's vital announcements were initially met with resistance backed by those with financial stakes in the commercial fats industry, her persistence paid off. Today, Dr. Johanna Budwig is world renowned for her important discoveries on the benefits of flaxseed oil. Her fame precedes her as she lectures all over Europe.
Fats-Good and Bad
Dr. Johanna preaches against the use of what she calls "pseudo" fats. In order to extend the shelf life of their products, manufacturers use chemical processes that render their food products harmful to the body. These harmful fats go by a number of names, including "hydrogenated," "partially hydrogenated" and even "polyunsaturated."
The chemical processing of fats destroys the vital electron cloud within the fat. Once the electrons have been removed, these fats can no longer bind with oxygen, and they actually become a harmful substance deposited within the body. The heart, for instance, rejects these fats and they end up as inorganic fatty deposits on the heart muscle itself.
Chemically processed fats are not water-soluble when bound to protein. They end up blocking circulation, damage heart action, inhibit cell renewal and impede the free flow of blood and lymph fluids. The bio-electrical action in these areas slows down and may become completely paralyzed. The entire organism shows a measurable loss of electrical energy which is replenished only by adding active lipids to the diet. These nutritional fats are truly vital for man and beast alike.
Science has proven that fats play an important role in the functioning of the entire body. Fats (lipids) are vital for all growth processing, renewal of cells, brain and nerve functions, even for the sensory organs (eyes and ears), and for the body's adjustment to heat, cold and quick temperature changes. Our energy resources are based on lipid metabolism. To function efficiently, cells require true polyunsaturated, live electron-rich lipids, present in abundance in raw flaxseed oil. True polyunsaturated fats greedily absorb proteins and oxygen and pump them through the system.
Lipids are only water-soluble and free-flowing when bound to protein; thus the importance of protein-rich cottage cheese. When high quality, electron-rich fats are combined with proteins, the electrons are protected until the body requires energy. This energy source is then fully and immediately available to the body on demand, as nature intended.
Proven Benefits Still Pouring In
Since Dr. Johanna Budwig's findings on the benefits of flaxseed oil have been widely publicized, scientists around the world have eagerly jumped on the bandwagon. Studies conducted using flaxseed oil on numerous disorders have been pouring in from all over the world, showing impressive results, including anti-tumor activity, increased metabolism, greatly boosted immune system, reduced cholesterol levels, normalized blood pressure levels and inhibition of cancer cell growth. Books research reports, articles and testimonials abound, all touting the healthy benefits achieved by supplementing the diet with organic, raw, cold-pressed flaxseed oil with low-fat cottage cheese. Dr. Budwig's research was based on using the ratio of 2 tablespoons flaxseed oil mixed with one-quarter cup of low fat cottage cheese.
Backed with all this extensive research, the indisputable fact is: Supplementing your diet daily with flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins could very well be the most important thing you do for yourself every day.
--------------------------------------...
A top European cancer research scientist, Dr Johanna Budwig, has
discovered a totally natural formula that not only protects against the
development of cancer but people all over the world who have been diagnosed
with incurable cancer and sent home to die have actually been cured and now
lead normal healthy lives.
After three decades of research Dr. Budwig, sixtime nominee for the Nobel
Award, found that the blood of seriously ill cancer patients was always,
without exception, deficient in certain important essential ingredients
which included substances called phosphatides and lipoproteins. (The blood
of a healthy person always contains sufficient quantities of these essential
ingredients. However, without these natural ingredients cancer cells grow
wild and out of control.)
Blood analysis showed a strange greenish-yellow substance in place of the
healthy red oxygen carrying hemoglobin that belongs there. This explained
why cancer patients weaken and become anemic This startling discovery led
Dr. Budwig to test her theory.
She found that when these natural ingredients where replaced over
approximately a three month period, tumors gradually receded. The strange
greenish elements in the blood were replaced with healthy red blood cells as
the phosphatides and lipoproteins almost miraculously reappeared. Weakness
and anemia disappeared and life energy was restored. Symptoms of cancer,
liver dysfunction and diabetes were completely alleviated.
Dr. Budwig then discovered an all natural way for people to replace those
essential ingredients their bodies so desperately needed in their daily
diet. By simply eating a combination of just two natural and delicious
foods not only can cancer be prevented but in case after case it was
actually cured. (These two natural foods, organic flax seed oil %26amp; cottage
cheese) must be eaten together to be effective since one triggers the
properties of the other to be released.)
After more than 10 years of solid clinical application, Dr. Budwig's natural
formula has proven successful where many orthodox remedies have failed. Dr.
Budwig's formula has been used therapeutically in Europe for prevention of:
Cancer! Arteriosclerosis, Strokes, Cardiac Infarction, Heartbeat
(irregular), Liver (fatty degeneration), Lungs (reduces bronchial
spasms), Intestines (regulates activity). Stomach Ulcers (normalizes
gastric juices), Prostate (hypertopic), Arthritis (exerts a favorable
influence), Eczema (assists all skin diseases), Old age (improves many
common afflictions), Brain (strenghthens activity), Immune Deficiency
Syndromes (multiple sclerosis, autoimmune illnesses)
Thousands have flocked to hear Dr. Budwig lecture all over Europe. The many
people Dr. Budwig's formula has helped testify to the benefits of her
remarkable discovery. Following are a few examples: In one of my interviews
with Dr. Budwig I was introduced to Siegried Ernst, M.D.. He is a rare and
dedicated man who counts among his personal friends the current Pope as well
as many other dignitaries.
--------------------------------------...
Testimonials :
Dr. Ernst
Seventeen years ago Dr. Ernst had developed cancer for which he had
major surgery requiring removal of his stomach. Two years later he had a
recurrence of the cancer and was offered chemotherapy as the only available
remedy. There was little hope for survival as virtually all individuals with
recurrence of this type of cancer rarely last a year.
Dr. Ernst knew that chemotherapy was not only ineffective for his type of
cancer but completaly destructive of the quality of life, so he refused.
He turned to Dr. Budwig and her formula for help. He religiously followed
Dr. Budwig's formula and fifteen years later has not had any recurrence of
cancer. As a matter of fact he seemed to me to be in perfect health and is
tireless for a man in his late seventies.
--------------------------------------...
Maria W.
Maria W. tells her story in her own words: "I was told by the most expert of
doctors that I would have to be operated on to cut out the cancerous tumor
that was causing a swelling under my eye. They explained that the size of
the tumor was much greater inside and that there was very serious bone
involvement. The malignancy was too far advanced to respond to radiation
treatment. The doctors planned to remove considerable facial tissue and
bone. I was afraid for my life, but being a young woman, couldn't bear the
thought of such disfigurement.
When I heard about Dr. Budwig's natural formula, I was skeptical but
desperate for help. After four months on this regimen, the swelling under my
left eye completely disappeared. The doctors at the University hospital gave
me many exhausting tests. One told me, 'If I didn't have your previous
x-rays and medical history in front of me, I wouldn't believe that you ever
had cancer. There is hardly any indication of a tumor remaining.' I never
thought using Dr, Budwig's formula would be so successful. My whole family
and I are very grateful."
--------------------------------------...
Sandy A.
An examination of Sandy A. revealed arachnoidal bleeding due to an
inoperable brain tumor. The doctors informed Sandy that he was beyond
medical help. At his expressed wish, Sandy was discharged from the
hospital and sent home to die in peace.
A friend brought Dr. Budwigs formula to Sandys attention. Sandy writes.
Since I went on the Budwig regimen, the paralysis is of my eyes, arms, and
legs has receded daily. After only a short period of time, I was able to
urinate normally. My health improved so rapidly that I was soon able to
return to my work part-time. Shortly after that, I was again examined at the
Research Center and my reflexes were completely normal. The Budwig diet
saved my life! Ten years later, I was given a thorough examination at the
Center as a follow-up. My incredible recovery has been written up In many
medical journals and I have become what they call a 'textbook case,' and
all because of Dr. Johanna Budwig's simple diet."
--------------------------------------...
Timmy G.
Seven years ago Timmy G. was diagnosed as having Hodgkins disease. The child
was operated on and underwent 24 radiation treatments, plus additional
experimental therapies that the experts hoped would be of some small help.
When Timmy failed to respond favorably to these heroic measures, he was
discharged as incurable, and given six months to live and sent home to die.
The desperate parents contacted specialists all over the world. A famous
newspaper took up Timmy's cause and ran editorials pleading for someone to
come forth who could offer hope for the life of a child. All the specialists
who replied confirmed the cruel prognosis: There was no hope or help for
Timmy.
At this dark hour the miracle the family had prayed for happened!
Timmy's mother told her story to the press: "A friend sent me a printed piece about one of Dr. Budwig's speeches. This material gave us hope and I contacted Dr. Budwig.
In just five days, (on the Budwig regimen) Timmy's breathing became normal
for the first lime In almost two years.
From this day on, Timmy began to feel good again. He went back to school, started swimming and by winter he was doing craft work. Everyone who knows him says how well he looks." At age 18 Timmy is showing great promise in his university work. He knows he owes his life to Dr. Budwig and thanks her daily in his prayers.
One of the two foods in on Budwig's formula, cottage cheese, is available
in nearly every grocery store in America. The other, pure organic linseed
oil, however comes primarily from Europe and can only be found in certain
health food stores throughout the United States.
By simply mixing these two delicious foods together and eating them you will
be providing yourself and your family with the optimal preventive
nutritional protection against cancer and other disease.
--------------------------------------...
Today, fresh expeller pressed flaxseed oil is available in most countries in the world, including USA and Europe.
Books to read:
"Flax Oil As a True Aid Against Arthritis Heart Infarction Cancer and Other Diseases"
by Johanna Dr. Budwig
Amazon Price: $5.56
Read more about this title...
"The Breuss Cancer Cure" : Advice for the Prevention and Natural Treatment of Cancer, Leukemia and Other Seemingly Incurable Diseases
by Rudolf Breuss Amazon Price : $11.00
"A Cancer Therapy" : Results of Fifty Cases and the Cure of Advanced Cancer by Diet Therapy : A Summary of 30 Years of Clinical Experimentation
by M. Max Gerson Amazon Price: $24.95
Read more about this title...
Flax Oil by Dr Budwig
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0...
http://www.oxytherapy.com/mail-archive/o...
Flax Oil and Cancer -A Tape Transcription by Clifford Beckwith
http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flax1...
Links to Other Flaxseed Oil %26amp; Health Sites
http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flaxl...
Dr. Budwig and The Healing Power of Flaxseed (Commercial site)
http://www.barleans.com/budwig.html
Essential Fatty Acids for Kids Superimmunity
http://www.healthychild.com/efa.htm
Flaxseed and the Immune System @ http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut16.htm
The Importance of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Adults and Children
http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut11.htm
Essential Fatty Acids: Are You Deficient In These Key Nutrients?
http://www.barleans.com/deficient.html
Other Pages On This Site About Cancer:
What Doctors say about Chemo Therapy here
What Doctors say about Radiation Therapy here
What doctors say about Breast cancer ? here
Cancer cause : Dental Risk ? here
Govallo http://home.earthlink.net/~emptherapies/...
Burzynski http://catalog.com/bri/bri.htm
Cancer %26amp; Nutrition Articles
http://drcranton.com/nutrition.htm Nutrition In The News
Diet
Gerson
http://www.gerson.com/history.html
http://www.1999.com/gerson/
http://www.gerson.com/cnb104.html
http://gerson.org/booklist.html..acancer...
Gerson Institute http://www.gerson.org/index.html
**************************************...
Tibetan Buddhist Monks - Sacred Healing Chant
EFAs, Oxygenation and Cancer Prevention
Cancer as well as heart disease can be prevented by taking a ratio of at least 1:1 up to 2.5:1 unadulterated parent omega-6 to
omega-3 essential fatty acids plus specific vitamins and minerals.
--------------------------------------...
Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 1 (December 2006 - January 2007)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. editor@nexusmagazine.com
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com
© 2006 by Prof. Brian Scott Peskin, BSEE (MIT)1
Website: http://www.BrianPeskin.com
Based on his book, co-written with
Amid Habib, MD, FAAP, FACE,
The Hidden Story of Cancer
(Pinnacle Press, Houston, USA, 2006)
--------------------------------------...
The prime cause of cancer is not genetic
Cancer was once an uncommon disease affecting a small percentage of Americans. In 1900, only 3% of the population died of cancer.2 But now, cancer has become so common that virtually everyone knows someone afflicted with this terrible disease. In fact, for the average American, contraction of cancer isn't the exception; instead, it has become the rule.3 We've come to accept cancer as unstoppable, incurable and even a natural part of life. This perception is a tragedy, since cancer is not a natural disease for man and is preventable.
What is shocking to most people, is the scientific fact that cancer is genetically recessive, not dominant. In fact, the human body is highly resistant to cancer. In 1969, Professor Henry Harris of Oxford University shook the cancer research community to its core when he proved these previous theories wrong. Professor Harris took normal tissue cells and fused three types of cancer cells to them. Surely, he thought, the cancer cells would take over the normal cells and "convert" them into cancer. Surprisingly, they grew normally.4
Contrary to popular opinion, cancer takes several decades to develop in humans.5 Given this long incubation period, science can show us the way to destroy any initial pre-cancerous cells and keep the cancerous ones from causing widespread damage.
If you think cancer has a genetic basis, then think again. Dr Robert A. Weinberg of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the world's leading cancer researchers and discoverer of the so-called oncogene (cancer-causing gene), reversed his previous conclusions after discovering that "fewer than one DNA base in a million appears to have been miscopied". It's not enough of a defect! His exact words: "Something was very wrong. The notion that a cancer developed through the successive activation of a series of oncogenes had lost its link to reality." He called the genetic discoveries made thus far "sterile".6 The prime cause of cancer is therefore not genetic. This was announced in 1998. Did you hear about it? Probably not.
In 2006, the heads of the world's largest cancer research centre in Houston, Texas, announced that cancer's prime cause isn't genetic: "'If it could have happened [solving cancer with genetics], it would have already happened with genetic mutations,' said William Brinkley, a senior vice-president at Baylor who says other research should take precedence over the cancer genome projectÉ Dr John Mendelsohn [president of M. D. Anderson Cancer Center] states, 'Any claims that this [genetic research] is going to be the key to curing cancer are not appropriate.'"7
Thus, the prime cause of cancer is not a genetic mutation. Even if cancer "runs in your family", there is real hope. Unfortunately, the geneticists have it backwards, attempting to force the facts to fit their genetics-based theories when they don't fit the facts, because, as Professor Harris demonstrated many years ago, cancer isn't genetically dominant. Where does this leave us? Where can we look for solutions? What about the popular nutritional solutions to fighting cancer?
The popular anti-cancer "solutions" don't work
Most people diligently follow the experts' recommendations in the hope of winning the war on cancer. Unfortunately, virtually nothing of what we are told is based on scientific facts. Consider the following list of supposed "solutions", along with the date of their published failures as reported in the world's leading medical journals. Many of us never hear of the retractions and consequently keep following methods that don't protect us from contracting cancer.
(a) Fruits and vegetables: Even the green leafy vegetables don't protect against contracting breast cancer (JAMA 2001; 285:769-776).8
(b) Fibre: This worsens colon cancer rather than helping prevent it (Lancet 2000; 356:1286-7).9
(c) Mammography: Samuel S. Epstein, MD (chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition), Rosalie Bertell and Barbara Seaman published an article exposing truths about mammography that most women have never been told (Int J Health Sci 2001; 31(3):605-15): "Contrary to popular belief and assurances by the US media...mammography is not a technique for early diagnosis. In fact, a breast cancer has usually been present for about eight (8) years before it can finally be detected..."10
(d) Fish oil: Most fish oil supplements are worthless in preventing cancer and may be hazardous to your health (articles: 1995Ð2006). The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) 4th Congress, which met on 4Ð9 June 2000 in Tsukuba, Japan, reported the following:11
"...[S]tudies indicate that at the levels used, fish oil [comprised of omega-3 derivatives] decreases a wide range of immune cell responses (natural killer cell, cytotoxic T lymphocyte activities, lymphocyte proliferation and production of IL-2 and IFN-y (1,2))..."
"...Recent studies have indicated that relatively low levels of the long chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA or DHA)...are sufficient to bring about some of the suppressive effects..."
"...This decrease (of inhibited lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity) causes increased cellular bacteria [infection] and impaired tumor cell killing."
Any substance causing impaired tumour cell killing ability is cancer-causingÑthe opposite of what we desire. With so many of us consuming fish oil, could this be another reason that cancer contraction rates are increasing instead of decreasing?
Fish oil is also worthless in preventing heart disease, and Harvard Medical School warned us about this years ago but too few Americans listened.12 Consuming whole fish instead of fish oil failed, too.13
The Japanese have greater cancer rates and greater heart disease rates than Americans. Cancer has been Japan's number-one cause of death since 1981.14 The popular media don't often disclose these startling facts.
In January 2006, the omega-3 anti-cancer fallacy was exposed (JAMA 2006; 295(4)): "A large body of literature spanning numerous cohorts from many countries and with different demographic characteristics does not provide evidence to suggest a significant association between omega-3 fatty acids and [lack of] cancer incidence. Dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids [is] unlikely to prevent cancer."15
The most comprehensive analysis to date, published in the British Medical Journal of 24 March 2006, reviewing 96 trials including 44 trials with supplements and five trials consisting of mainly ALA (parent omega-3) from plants like flax with the remainder being fish oil, confirms the anti-cancer failure: "We found no evidence that omega-3 fats had an effect on the incidence of cancer and there was no inconsistency... This systematic review assessed the health effects of using omega-3 fats (together or separately) on total mortality, cardiovascular events, cancer and strokes in a wide variety of participants and found no evidence of a clear benefit of omega-3 fats on health."16
Unfortunately, in spite of these facts, most physicians around the world still recommend fish oil to prevent both cancer and heart disease.
(e) Soy: Soy products won't protect you against contracting cancer, either. The properties of soy are still touted by nutritionists, physicians and popular health and beauty publications, all ignorant of the scientific facts. There is a very hazardous side to soy that you need to know about. For example, the article "Soybean Goiter: Report of Three Cases" (NEJM 1960; 262(22):1099-1103) details three cases of infants developing goitre when they were consuming soybean "formula". The condition was rapidly eliminated in two of the infants when the soy "formula" was terminated. The third child was cured when iodine was added to the diet.17
What did soy formula have to do with thyroid (goitre) problems? Soybeans are a source of isoflavonoids, including genistein and daidzein. Contrary to popular belief and what is often reported in the media, they are both hazardous to your health. The following comes from Biochemical Pharmacology 1997; 54:1087-96): "Soybeans contain compounds (genistein and daidzein-the 'active ingredients') that inhibit [interfere with] thyroid peroxidase (TPO) which is essential to thyroid hormone synthesis [production]." Soybeans are not good for the thyroid! The popular so-called phyto-oestrogens genistein and daidzein are actually endocrine disruptors. Women around the world have been misled. What does soy "formula" have to do with the iodine deficiency? Soy contains phytates which "magnetise out" essential nutrients like iodine.
Today, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services, lists 288 records of soy at its "FDA Poisonous Plant Database" (March 2006 revision). Their website will shock you as you discover that soy is anything but a health food (http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~djw/pltx.cgi?Q...
Soy harms your immune system, too. Back in 1975, the Canadian Journal of Biochemistry reported that soybeans actually weaken your immune system:21 "Soybean trypsin inhibitor was found to inhibit transformation of human lymphocytes..."
Here's why this happens. Trypsin is an enzyme produced by your pancreas and used in digesting protein; it is critical for antibody production. An inhibitor is something that disables. Think of it like having one foot on the gas and another on the brake of your automobile at the same time. Your car's engine would blow up.
So a trypsin inhibitor will irritate your pancreas, stressing it to produce hormones when it can't, leading to decreased oxygenation from the irritation. Soy prevents the protein you eat from being fully utilised and digested. Your immune system can't get fuelled with proper antibodies and lymphocytes--a double whammy. Therefore, soy is cancer-causing to your pancreas, and cancer of the pancreas is typically a death sentence. Because of bad advice, many women especially have decreased the amount of cancer-fighting animal-based protein they consume in favour of soy. Resist this incorrect advice and minimise your chances of contracting both thyroid and pancreatic cancer.
Dr Otto Warburg's anti-cancer research
Many of my physician colleagues were shocked to discover these truths. How many of us saw these important medical journal findings reported in the popular press? Unfortunately, not enough of us. Don't despair, because there is an anti-cancer answer. It was discovered back in 1925 by Otto Warburg, MD, PhD. Dr Warburg has been referred to as the greatest biochemist of the 20th century; the sheer number and magnitude of his discoveries qualify him as the most accomplished biochemist of all time.22
In the 1920s, Dr Warburg carried on the research on respiratory enzymes, certain vitamins and minerals that the body requires for the utilisation of oxygen in the cells, which eventually earned him the Nobel Prize in 1931. (Today, these vitamins and minerals are termed "co-enzymes".) The Nobel Committee clearly expected the medical world to benefit through Otto Warburg's vital discoveries about cancer. Unfortunately, politics intervened and cancer wasn't eradicated.
Despite his early successes and honours, Dr Warburg continued to make major fundamental discoveries throughout his later years as well, capping off an amazingly fruitful 60-year career in research. In addition, Dr Warburg often created new tools for his research. For example, he discovered how to measure the pressure of oxygen in a living cell by developing a special manometerÑa very important development that led to his discovery that low oxygen concentration and pressure always presaged the development of cancer.
The importance of Dr Warburg's achievement is that he isolated the functional prime cause of cancer. Rather than working on a theoretical level too far removed from the physiological realities of cancer to be able to provide practical therapies and preventive programs, he described the actual conditions in the cells that set up and cause cancer, and by doing this made it possible for others later to develop functional, practical ways to inhibit the development of cancer.
It is appalling that no significant principle out of his numerous discoveries has been utilised by the US medical research community for cancer prevention, treatment and remission retention. Despite the expression of opinions disputing the direction and validity of Warburg's work, no scientist or researcher has ever disproved the validity, correctness or applicability of these important discoveries to the prevention and cure of cancer. Even today, medical consensus often has little to do with science. Politics has squandered the efforts of many cancer researchers.
The prime cause of cancer
We have become so accustomed to being told that "some day" we might discover what causes cancer and that cancer is the major medical mystery of our modern time, that the following might be hard to believe.
Dr Otto Warburg discovered and clearly stated that the prime, most basic, cause of cancer is too little oxygen getting into the cell. "We find by experiment about 35% inhibition of oxygen respiration already suffices to bring about such a transformation during cell growth," he stated at a 1966 conference of Nobel laureates in Lindau, Germany.28
That's it! It sounds very simple, doesn't it? Just one-third less oxygen than normal and you contract cancer. Based on meticulous experiments that he and many others verified numerous times, Dr Warburg discovered and stated that the prime, number-one cause of cancer is simply too little oxygen getting into the cell (hypoxia).
It gets worse because once a cell becomes cancerous, it can't return to normal; it must be destroyed (Science 1956; 123(3191)).29
When I first encountered this information, I didn't believe it. Even now, there is still no one who is more shocked than I am! To my amazement, this cancer-oxygen connection information has been published numerous times in recent cancer journals, e.g., Radiotherapy and Oncology 1993; 26(1):45-50 and 1999; 53:113-17.30 However, the practical solution to solving the oxygen deficiency problem has evaded researchersÑprobably because they haven't known where to start.
Taking hydrogen peroxide, calcium supplements, fish oil supplements, massive amounts of omega-3, ozone or so-called "oxygenated water" won't solve the cellular oxygen deficiency. No one has been able to advance Dr Warburg's discovery until now.
This lack of understanding explains many of the misunderstood biochemical activities related to cancer that waste precious time and lead virtually nowhere. Only Dr Warburg's anti-cancer discovery predicts so many never-before-explained real-life results.31
Dr Warburg's discovery has been verified numerous times both in turning normal cells cancerous and in showing that cancer doesn't develop in highly oxygenated areas. Surprisingly, it was American physicians who conclusively proved it in 1953 and confirmed it in 1955! Goldblatt and Cameron noted (p. 535) (J. Experimental Medicine 1953; 97:535-552) that once damage is too great to the cell, then no amount of oxygen will return the cell's respiration back to normal: it is forever doomed to a cancerous life.
This is why prevention is the ultimate solution to never contracting cancer. However, they confirmed it is possible to prevent a "respiration-impacted" precancerous cell from becoming permanently cancerous if oxygen deficiency is stopped early enough.32
Secondary causes of cancer
Virtually every supposed cause of cancer mentioned today in the health and nutritional media is a secondary cause. Secondary causes include things such as environment, chemical carcinogens, environmental and medical radiation, trans-fats, food additives, the chemicals in tobacco smoke, viruses and even genetic mutations.
There are innumerable secondary causes of cancer, and minimising them and their harmful effects can be helpful in preventing cancer. But endlessly pursuing new secondary causes, like smoking, without explaining specifically what common effect they have on the cells, has never led, and will never lead, researchers to a real cancer cure.
Dr Warburg cautioned us again and again about wasting precious time pursuing secondary causes. Make no mistake about this: the thing every secondary cause of cancer has in common with every other one is that it leads, directly or indirectly, to insufficient oxygen in the cells. Therefore, if we directly address the question of how to get sufficient oxygen into the cells, we will have minimised the danger from every type of secondary cause.
Exercise is not the solution to remaining cancer-free
I know what many of you are likely thinking: "I exercise a lot, therefore I am oxygenating my blood. I've got cancer beat!" No. All that exercise didn't stop world champion cyclist Lance Armstrong from contracting cancer. It is true that by exercising you are increasing oxygenation to your blood. However, by doing so, you still haven't guaranteed that this oxygen will be transferred effectively to each cell in each organ in your body.
Dr Warburg made it quite clear that oxygen alone is not sufficient: "To be sure, cancer development takes place even in the presence of free oxygen gas in the atmosphere, but this oxygen may not penetrate in sufficient quantity into the growing body cells, or the respiratory apoenzymes of the growing body cells may not be saturated with the active groups."34
There are many factors that promote the lack of cellular oxygen, including certain deficiencies we will talk about shortly. Exercise, by itself, is therefore not the solution to remaining cancer free. Many people, including athletes, who exercise regularly still get cancer. Furthermore, a person breathes at least 17,000 times a day (12 breaths a minute). Do you really think that you aren't breathing in enough oxygen with 17,000 breaths a day? You are. The problem lies elsewhere.
Essential fatty acids and EFA-containing oils
The body requires special fats that, among other important functions, make it possible for sufficient oxygen to reach the cells via the cellular membranes, which are the key. These special fats are highly oxygen-absorbing. Called essential fatty acids, or EFAs, these special fats must be supplied from outside the body every day, from foods and certain oils, because your body can't manufacture them on its own. There are two "parent" forms of EFAs that allow your body to make whatever it needs from them, i.e., various types of EFA "derivatives". Parent omega-6 is termed linoleic acid (LA), and parent omega-3 is termed alpha-linolenic acid (ALA).
For tables of EFA-containing oils, shown with their percentages of parent omega-6 to parent omega-3, as well as of some EFA derivatives, see http://www.BrianPeskin/Nexus.com. With all the hoopla about olive oil, I want you to know that it contains mainly omega-9, a non-essential oil that your body itself makes. "Extra virgin" olive oil is traditionally unprocessed and therefore not cancer-causing, but it won't protect you against contracting cancer in the least. Avoid margarine: it won't go bad even when kept out of the fridge. This is the proof of hydrogenated oil's failure to oxygenate. If it still could oxygenate when eaten, it would turn rancid when left unrefrigerated--just like fish does. Canola and soy oils are not recommended; neither was ever meant for human consumption but as food for farm animals or for industrial applications. Many foods, especially salad dressings, now contain canola oil. You should try to avoid it.
The oils must be uncooked, or at the very least only slightly heated, to retain their important nutritional properties. Also bear in mind that some supplement manufacturers' labels fail to separately identify and distinguish the parent EFAs from the EFA derivatives. It may be impossible to tell whether you are getting the parent EFAs or the EFA derivatives. Make certain of what you're getting before you purchase it. Make sure the oils are raw, unprocessed and organic and that they do not contain fish oil or any hydrogenated oils.
Omega-6 versus omega-3 ratios in the body
We must look at the tissue content of our bodies to determine what oils contain the best anti-cancer EFAs. It is known from pathology studies that the brain and nervous system have a ratio of one part omega-6 to one part omega-3 (1:1). Some nutritionists suggest that this ratio is best, but they are wrong. Here's why.
Most organs contain a 4:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. However, the brain, nervous system and organs comprise only about 12% of body weight. Skin is 100% parent omega-6 and contains no omega-3;35 it comprises about 4% of body weight. The muscles comprise at least 50% of total body weight and are the prime factor to account for in determining the required parent omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. A key fact about muscle structure is that muscle contains from 5.5 to 7.5 times more omega-6 than omega-3, depending on the degree of physical condition.36 We are warned about "overdosing" on omega-6 in our diets and told that we must take lots of oils containing omega-3 to compensate. We are told that we are ingesting upwards of 20 times too much omega-6. This is wrong, and there is much more to the analysis.
Scientifically, you need an organic supplement with a ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 of 1:1 up to 2.5:1. With this powerfully effective ratio, you only require a minimum amount of 3-4 grams on a daily basis. This ratio is significantly different than your physician, health practitioner or writers on popular nutritional publications will likely suggest: they simply don't know and understand the basis of it. Their analysis consists of a significant number of errors, and I hope you will review the paper "The Scientific Calculation of the Optimum Omega 6/3 Ratio" at http://www.BrianPeskin.com (click on "EFA Report") so you will understand this as well as the science behind the calculation of the ideal omega-6 to omega-3 ratio.
Today, people automatically think of fish oil or flax oil as the anti-cancer solution. Following these incorrect recommendations is a significant factor in why America's cancer rates continue to skyrocket in spite of millions of people taking these oils. Fish oil, with an overdose of omega-3 series derivatives, can actually be cancer-causing-the opposite of what we desire--and flax oil contains far too much parent omega-3.
Most parent omegas do not get converted to derivatives; they remain in the cell membranes and tissues in original parent form. Few scientists understand this and few medical texts explain it.37 Furthermore, commercial food processing destroys a significant amount of these EFAs, along with their oxygenating ability.
EFA-containing foods in the diet
Here's a representative listing of categories of foods containing these essential oils. It is imperative to understand that these foods must be grown organically and, if necessary, processed with low heat and no artificial preservatives-otherwise the EFAs will be ruined, like the trans-fat, hydrogenated, cancer-causing oils you've heard about. Compare your diet and these EFA-containing foods. Are you getting enough of them?
Dairy/eggs/cheese: "Raw milk" cheeses and organic eggs are excellent sources of EFAs. Pasteurised (heated) milk is deficient in EFAs and is detrimental to infants.
Meats: Organically raised and processed chicken, beef (grass-fed is best38), lamb, pork, etc. are rich sources of EFAs. Animal-based protein is also important for obtaining anti-cancer vitamins and minerals and for producing strong haemoglobin which enables oxygen transportation.
Nuts: Organic, unprocessed raw almonds, walnuts, peanuts, cashews, etc.
Seafood: Shrimp (prawns), fish, lobster, crab, clams, oysters, etc. It is important to understand that consuming lots of seafood is not the anti-cancer answer. Seafood is overly abundant in both parent and derivative omega-3 EFAs. Fish, especially farmed fish, contains mostly omega-3 derivatives; farmed fish and oil from farmed fish are to be avoided.
Seeds: Organic sunflower, sesame, flax, pumpkin, etc.
The following foods do not contain usable EFAs for humans:
Fruits and vegetables: Animals with multiple stomachs can extract EFAs out of plant-based cellulose like grass, but humans, with only one stomach, cannot. Even if we could extract the EFAs, we could never eat the volume required to get enough.
Grains/cereals: Humans cannot extract the EFAs from them.
The miracle of EFA "oxygen magnets"
Think of these polyunsaturated EFAs as "oxygen magnets". The proof of this fact is buried in the world's leading medical textbooks and medical journals such as Harper's Illustrated Biochemistry, 26th edition,40 and Human Nutrition Clinical Nutrition, July 1984.41
EFAs are integral to the structure and function of cellular respiration. Without high respiration efficiency, cancer is soon to follow. These EFA oxygen magnets in the cell membrane attract the oxygen that's in the bloodstream and transfer it into the cell, just like little oxygen sponges. This process is supposed to be happening in each of the body's 100 trillion cells.
So, no matter how much you breathe or exercise, if you don't have the proper functional EFAs at the cellular level then your cells will not absorb enough oxygen from your bloodstream and you will be that much more susceptible to cancer. Remember that the cancer "threshold" is a 35% decrease in cellular oxygen.
Without a continuing new supply of these EFAs from food, cellular oxygen transfer is significantly reduced. Imagine what would happen if you had 100 trillion cells that were all deficient in a vital substance they required to be able to absorb oxygen.
Here's an example showing how these essential fats absorb oxygen. At the supermarket, fish goes bad in only a few days because the oil in the fish is highly oxygen-absorbing-it reacts rapidly with the oxygen in the air. Fish spoils rapidly because the EFA-containing oil has the capacity to absorb lots of oxygen. This chemical process is called oxidation. This is also true with other types of essential fats. They do their job of absorbing oxygen, but because of it they have a limited life. They simply won't work after a short period. EFAs become "spent", i.e., rancid. That's why they need to be replaced every day from our food-Nature designed us this way.
There are many ways to add additional oxygen to the bloodstream, such as by exercising, drinking "oxygenated" water or breathing purer air. However, these partial solutions are insufficient for maximum anti-cancer protection. When the EFA deficiency is solved, every organ becomes its own "oxygen magnet", just as Nature intended.
Breast cancer and oxygen deficiency
Breast cancer is the number-one cancer plague to women worldwide. The growing incidence of breast cancer can be explained for the first time in light of Dr Warburg's discovery about lack of oxygen to the cells.
The breasts consist of an exceptionally high amount of fatty tissue. A typical cell membrane in muscle tissue is half-fat and contains about one-third EFAs (oxygen transferors). However, fatty tissue like the breast contains areas of 80-95% fat concentration. These fatty components of breast tissue require and should have high EFA concentrations, but because of modern food processing they don't. Because important organs such as the brain, heart, lungs and kidneys require EFAs on a priority basis, there may not be enough left over to ensure that breast tissue receives an adequate amount of EFAs.
Therefore, oxygen deficiency in the breast tissue will be very significant.
Given this premise, we can deduce that breast tissue should and would be the number-one expected cancer site in women worldwide, and it is. This conclusion makes so much sense in explaining the massive rise in breast cancer rates. Harvard's Dr W. C. Willett gives us the proof. In a study on the intake of parent omega-6 involving over 80,000 nurses, it was shown that the group with the lowest intake of linoleic acid (parent omega-6) exhibited the highest incidence of breast cancer (NEJM 1987; 316(1):22-28).42
Has your ob-gyn told you that you need this miraculous anti-cancer nutrient? I doubt it; he or she probably doesn't know.
Fish oil won't stop heart disease
Surprisingly, it was known back in 1979 that diet influenced EFA composition of the cell membrane; this finding was published in Cancer Research (1979; 39:1726-32).43 In 1990, a masterpiece of research conducted by William E. Lands found that the amount of critical parent omega-6 in the tissues was dependent on diet (Lipids 1990; 25(9):505-16).44
To gain the best in scientific research, in 2002 I attended the world's 1st Essential Fatty Acids and Human Nutrition and Health International Conference in Shanghai, China.
There I discovered a shocking and unexpected discovery that fish oil lowers immunity. I nearly fell out of my chair! Overdosing on fish oil supplements can significantly decrease the effectiveness of your immune system, increasing your risk of contracting cancer. The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) June 2000 Congress in Tsukuba, Japan,45 had reported this startling fact, as noted earlier.
And don't think that fish oil prevents heart disease. It doesn't. Cardiovascular Research (2002; 54:183-190) reported on a study where both the fish oil group and the control group showed close to equal atherosclerotic progression (arteries getting more clogged in spite of taking fish oil supplements). Nor did fish oil stop thickening of the artery. On the contrary, the artery wall got thicker (worsened) with fish oil ingestion! A mere 1.65 grams per day of fish oil supplement was taken-a great enough dose to cause adverse immunity and excessive internal bleeding, too.46
These results showing the failure of fish oil were published in 2002. Did this stop "experts" in the nutritional and medical fields and even in our governments from declaring how great fish oil supplements are? No!
Harvard Medical School was involved in a study, published in 1995, titled "Controlled Trial of Fish Oil for Regression of Human Coronary Atherosclerosis" (Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(7):1492-8).47
The daily dose was six grams of fish oil versus six grams of olive oil in the control group. Their conclusion? "Fish oil treatment for two years does not promote major favorable changes in the diameter of atherosclerotic coronary arteries" (author's emphasis). This means that arterial clogging was not decreased with the fish oil supplements.
Omega-6 derivative AA prevents blood clotting
Dr Warburg understood that slow blood speed allowed cancer to metastasise. Later, other researchers showed that if you can keep a localised cancer from metastasising, your risk of dying from cancer decreases by an amazing tenfold! Even though you may have cancer, you won't die from it. Blood speed and viscosity have a connection to the spread of cancer. This is a surprising, seldom-mentioned fact that was pointed out by world-renowned molecular biologist Robert Weinberg.49
What causes metastasis? Blood clots, and this is known, too.50 What prevents blood from "sticking together" and is also Nature's natural blood-thinner that prevents blood clots? No, it's not omega-3, like you are constantly told. Parent omega-6 is much more powerful. Arachidonic acid (AA) is a critical omega-6 derivative and major biochemical component which occurs in virtually every cell we have. It is the building block of the most potent anti-aggregatory ("helps blood thinning") agent known, termed prostacyclin. AA also inhibits platelet adhesion, making it a natural "blood thinner". AA even helps solve vascular problems as a response to injury.51
Heart attack victims often have depleted EFA levels, especially the EFA derivatives AA from parent omega-6 and EPA from parent omega-3.56 We need some parent omega-3 because EPA is one of its important derivatives. The problem is that fish oil supplements overdose us with far too much.
What's really clogging the arteries
Contrary to what we have heard for decades, it is not the saturated fat that clogs the arteries and impedes blood flow: it's the adulterated parent omega-6.
A groundbreaking Lancet article (1994; 344:1195-96) reported investigating the components of arterial plaques. Felton et al. measured the individual components, and in an aortic artery clog they found over 10 different compounds but no saturated fat.57 There was some cholesterol in the clog. This is explained by the fact that cholesterol acts as a protective healer for arterial cuts and bruises, just like a scab forms over external cuts.
What is the predominant component of a clog? You probably guessed it: the adulterated omega-6 polyunsaturated oils-those that start out containing properly functioning EFAs but get ruined during commercial food processing. Many similar analyses of arterial clogs showing the same result have been carried out and published in the medical journals, but it would seem that few physicians have seen them.58 The average person has little, if any, chance of ever discovering the truth.
So, it is not cholesterol itself that clogs the arteries. If you have a deficiency of EFAs, cholesterol acts as a "poison delivery system". EFAs are cholesterol's major component. As the medical textbook Molecular Biology of the Cell makes clear (p. 481), cholesterol is necessary for the structural integrity of the lipid bi-layer, the matrix in each of our 100 trillion cell membranes. JAMA (1994; 272:1335-40) published an article stating that cholesterol-lowering drugs do not work significantly to prevent heart disease. The reason? They can't lower the amount of defective parent omega-6 enough.
As stated in Current Atherosclerosis Reports (2004; 6:477-84), this is why cholesterol drugs can't do the job:59 "LDL contains up to 80% lipids [fats and oils], including polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol, mainly esters. Linoleic acid (LA), one of the most abundant fatty acids in LDLÉ"
With this information, we see that it is what the cholesterol is transporting-the adulterated EFAs-that is the problem. An article in Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition (1984; 38C:245-260) further verifies that it is parent omega-6 that makes up most of the fatty acids in LDL and HDL cholesterol.60
Don't let anyone ever tell you that natural fats are "bad". One hundred trillion cells need lots of EFA-containing natural fats; in particular, lots of parent omega-6.
If just a little of this parent omega-6 is defective, reducing its ability to absorb oxygen and perform other cellular functions, it acts as a direct cause of cancer as well as heart disease. °
Must watch video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
and then
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVtqTQEQs...
This plan's continuation is in CODEX Alimentarius ....
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.ph...
Stop Codex: Protect Health Freedom :: HealthFreedomUSA.org
http://www.parc.gov.pk/fqnp.html
PARC || FQNP at NARC
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ind...
CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
Codex Alimentarius
Current mood: awake
Category: Food and Restaurants
Codex Alimentarius is to be implemented on December 31, 2009. As if there weren't already enough unnatural ingredients in foods that have names you can't easily pronounce (nor know why they are in the food in the first place). Please check out HealthFreedomUSA to learn more about the coming implementation of this "nutricidal" plan.
According to the video of Dr. Laibow discussing Codex, there is A LOT of deception regarding Codex. Dr. Laibow exposes this deception and what will happen if Codex is not stopped.
PLEASE become informed %26amp; pass this along!
A 90% Cancer Cure Diet using Flaxseed Oil %26amp; Cottage Cheese?
This is unfounded and the use of oils in prostate cancer may worsen the condition. For other cancers and conditions, the diet is sound from a nutritional standpoint although unsupported by peer review as a cure for cancer. However, it should do no harm. But there is no miracle cure.
Reply:Breaking news! You're an idiot!
Reply:Thank you, I'm sure it will be a big help to many. I'll pass it on to as many as I can.
Reply:Screams "quack" from sentence one.
Cancer isn't one ailment, it's an entire family, maybe several families, of diseases.
Reply:That's actually really unhealthy %26amp; may actually cause cancer in the future
Cancer, Arthritis, Multiple sclerosis, Psoriasis, Eczema, Acne, ...
Flaxseed oil and cottage cheese
Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient combination actually prevents and cures cancer!
--------------------------------------...
HOME - The Cancer Homepage
--------------------------------------...
Read Flaxseed oil Testimonials :
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158...
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/1158...
--------------------------------------...
Six time nobel award nominated doctor says this essential nutrient
combination actually prevents and helps body to cure cancer!
by Robert Willner, M.D.,Ph.D.
(author of "The Cancer Solution").
--------------------------------------...
Dr.Johanna Budwig Mix:
Put in your blender:
1 cup Organic cottage cheese (low fat, not too hard one, best make your own)(or yogurt)
2-5 Tbsp. of flaxseeed oil-
1-3 Tbsp. of freshly ground up flaxseed (coffee grinder ($15) works fine)
enough water to make it soft
little cayenne
optional:
little garlic
little red pepper
little champagne
Make it very soft.
Eat some of it every day.
(PS Adjust quantities for your taste !)
--------------------------------------...
THE BUDWIG FLAX OIL DIET
The Flaxseed (Linseed) oil diet was originally proposed by Dr. Johanna Budwig, a german biochemist and expert on fats and oils, in 1951 and recently re-examined by Dr. Dan C. Roehm M.D. FACP (Oncologist and former cardiologist) in 1990. Dr. Roehm claims: "this diet is far and away the most successful anti-cancer diet in the world".
Budwig claims that the diet is both a preventative and a curative. She says the absence of linol-acids [in the average western diet] is responsible for the production of oxydase, which induces cancer growth and is the cause of many other chronic disorders.
The beneficial oxydase ferments are destroyed by heating or boiling oils in foods, and by nitrates used for preserving meat, etc.
The theory is: the use of oxygen in the organism can be stimulated by protein compounds of sulphuric content, which make oils water-soluble and which is present in cheese, nuts, onion and leek vegetables such as leek, chive, onion and garlic, but especially cottage cheese.
Ferments of cell respiration closely connected with the highly unsaturated fatty acids, are also needed for proper oxydation. It is essential to use only unrefined, cold-pressed oils with high linolic acid content, such as linseed, sunflower, soya, poppyseed, walnut, and corn oils. Such oil should be consumed together with foods containing the right proteins otherwise the oils will have the OPPOSITE EFFECT, causing more harm than good.
The best combination is cottage cheese and linseed oil. The linseed should be freshly ground. Carbohydrates containing natural sugar, such as dates, figs, pears, apples and grapes, are also included in the diet. Honey is also beneficial. Most of the synthetic vitamin A preparations are bad because they contain oxidation products, but much carotine as provitamin A (from carrot) is consumed. Vitamin B from buttermilk, yoghurt, and natural yeast is beneficial.
A person requires daily about 4 oz. of cottage cheese mixed well with 1.5 oz. of linseed oil and 1 oz. of milk. A blender or egg beater works fine. The mixture an be sweeten with honey or otherwise flavoured naturally. Fresh fruits can be added. Every morning 2 spoonfuls of freshly ground linseed oil should be taken in luke warm buttermilk or yoghurt.
The diet is indicated for all kinds of chronic diseases, especially heart ailments (corony thrombosis), gall disorders, diabetes, arthritis, and malignancies. It improves failing hearing and sight. It is the ideal nutrient for children and infants. It is suggested that this diet be supplemented with lactic acid ferments (4).
"What she (Dr. Johanna Budwig) has demonstrated to my initial disbelief but lately, to my complete satisfaction in my practice is: CANCER IS EASILY CURABLE, the treatment is dietary/lifestyle, the response is immediate; the cancer cell is weak and vulnerable; the precise biochemical breakdown point was identified by her in 1951 and is specifically correctable, in vitro (test-tube) as well as in vivo (real)... " (Roehm, "Townsend Letter for Doctors", July 1990)
GENERAL RULES
The patient has no nourishment on day ..1 other than 250 ml (8.5 oz) of Flax Oil with honey plus freshly squeezed fruit juices (no sugar added!). In the case of a very ill person, champagne may be added on the first day in place of juice and is taken with the Flax Oil and honey. Champagne is easily absorbable and has a serious purpose here.
1) SUGAR IS ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN. Grape juice may be added to sweeten any other freshly squeezed juices.
2) Other 'forbiddens' are:
- All animal fats.
- All Salad Oils (this included commercial mayonnaise)
- All Meats (chemicals %26amp; hormones)
- Butter
- Margarine
- Preserved Meats (the preservatives block metabolism even of Flax Oil)
3) Freshly squeezed vegetable juices are fine - carrot, celery, apple, and red beet.
4) Three times daily a warm tea is essential - peppermint, rose hips or grape tea - all sweetened as desired with honey. One cup of black tea before noon is fine.
DAILY PLAN
Before breakfast - a glass of Acidophilus milk or Sauerkraut juice is taken.
Breakfast - Muesli (regular cereal) is overlaid with 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Flax Oil and honey and fresh fruit according to season - berries, cherries, apricots, peaches, grated apple. Vary the flavour from day to day. Use any nuts except peanuts! Herbal teas as desired or black tea. A 4 oz (120 g) serving of THE SPREAD (directions below). This is fine to eat 'straight' like a custard, or add it to other foods taken in the day as you will see.
Morning tea (10am) - A glass of fresh carrot juice, apple, celery, or beet-apple juice is taken.
Lunch - Raw salad with yoghurt-Flax Oil Mayonnaise (directions below).
In addition to 'greens' salads, use grated turnips, carrots, kohlrabi, radishes, sauerkraut or cauliflower. A fine powder of horseradish, chives or parsley may be added for flavour.
Cooked Meal Course - Steamed vegetables, potatoes, or such grains as rice, buck-wheat or millet may be served. to these add either THE SPREAD or THE MAYO - for flavour and to up your intake of Flax Oil. Also mix THE SPREAD with potatoes for an especially hearty meal. Add caraway, chives, parsley or other herbs.
Dessert - Mix fresh fruit other than those used for breakfast with THE SPREAD, this time (instead of honey), flavoured using cream of lemon, vanilla or berries.
Afternoon Tea (4pm) - A small glass of natural wine (no preservatives) or champagne or fresh fruit juice with 1-2 tablespoons of honey-coated Fax Seeds.
Supper - Have this early, at 6pm. Make a hot meal using buckwheat, oat or soy cakes. grits from buckwheat are the very best and can be placed in a vegetable soup, or in a more solid form of cakes with herbal sauce. Sweet sauces %26amp; soups can always be given far more healing energy by adding THE SPREAD. Only honey or grape juice can be used for sweeteners. NO white sugar (or brown!) Only freshly squeezed juices and NOT reconstituted juices (preservative danger) may be used. These must be completely natural.
How to prepare 'THE SPREAD'
Place 250 ml (8.5 oz) Flax Oil into a mixer bowl and add one pound (450 g) of 1 ottage Cheese (ie low fat eg Quark) and add 4 tablespoons (60 ml) of Honey. Turn on the mixer and add just enough low fat milk or water to get the contents of the bowl to blend in together. In 5 minutes, a preparation of custard consistency results that has NO taste of the oil (and no oily 'ring' should be seen when you rinse out the bowl).
Alternatively, you can use Yoghurt instead of Cottage Cheese in proportions of 1 oz (30 g) of Yoghurt to 1 tablespoon (15 ml) each of Flax Oil and of honey and blend as above.
NOTE: When Flax Oil is blended like this, it does not cause diarrhoea even when given in large amounts. It reacts chemically with the (sulphur) proteins of the cottage cheese, yoghurt, etc.
How to prepare 'THE MAYO' (Mayonnaise):
Mix together 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Flax Oil, 2 tablespoons (30 ml) milk, and 2 tablespoons (30 ml) Yoghurt.
Then add 2 tablespoons (30 ml) of Lemon juice (or Apple Cider Vinegar) and add 1 teaspoon (2.5g) Mustard plus some herbs such as marjoram or dill.
Next add 2 or 3 slices of health food store pickles (no preservatives! - read label!) and a pinch of herbal salts.
(The above mayonnaise plus lots of mustard and a few bananas is very tasty!)
Concluding remarks by Dr. Roehm - "I only wish that all my patients had a PhD in Biochemistry and Quantum Physics to enable them to see how with such consummate skill this diet was put together. It is a wonder. The champagne vehicle IS easier to assimilate and get someone almost on their death-bed going again. A retention enema of 250 ml (8.5 oz) of oil is another route to get this precious life-furthering, ELECTRON-RICH oil into the body. It can also be applied to the skin for transdermal
absorption. I'll answer your questions and give you "special orders" for you particular case.
You will have to remain on this diet for a good 5 years, at which time your tumour may have disappeared. Persons who break the rules of this diet, Dr Budwig reports, (ie eating preserved meats, candy, etc) will sometimes grow rapidly worse and cannot be saved after they come back from their spree (bon-bons mean bye-bye).
In 1967, Dr Budwig broadcast the following sentence during an interview over the South German Radio Network, describing her incoming patients with failed operations and x-ray therapy":
"Even in these cases it is possible to restore health in a few months at most, I would truly say 90f the time".
"This has never been contradicted, but this knowledge has been a long time reaching this side of the ocean, hasn't it? Cancer treatment can be very simple and very successful once you know how. The cancer interests dont want you to know this.
May those of you who have suffered from this disease (and I include your family and friends in this) forgive the miscreants who have kept this simple information from reaching you for so long".
(signed) Dan C. Roehm, M.D. FACP
--------------------------------------...
"The best, purest, most carefully prepared Flax Oil in America is, in my opinion", said Roehm, "is Omegaflo. Arrowhead mills label is most often seen in Florida (USA). Look for the Omegaflo".
"FLAX (LINSEED) OIL is readily denatured by oxygen, heat, and light. That's why it is used in paint. Rancid oil is bad for health, so oil MUST be carefully produced, packed under nitrogen in light-proof
containers, refrigerated until used, used as fresh as possible, and stabilised with protein (THE SPREAD, etc) promptly once the container is opened..."
Flax Seeds may also be used. Seeds need only be cracked in a food blender, or they may be ground in a coffee grinder. One needs three times the amount of seed to get the oil equivalent. Seeds are high in calories, so one may gain weight. The seeds are also high in soluble fibre, so blending with liquid tends to produce ever-hardening "jellies". Fresh-cracked seed sprinkled on muesli %26amp; eaten promptly
tastes great.
-------
Ed McCabe (p85, "Oxygen Therapies") discusses his point of view on
essential fatty acids:
"The red blood cells in the lungs give up carbon dioxide and take on oxygen. They are then transported to the cell site via the blood vessels, where, they release their oxygen into the plasma. This released oxygen is "attracted" to the cells by the "resonance" of the pi-electron" oxidation-enhancing fatty acids. Otherwise, oxygen cannot work its way into the cell. "Electron rich fatty acids" play the decisive role in "respiratory enzymes, which are the basis of cell oxidation...".
"Dont eat anything hydrogenated like (like margarine, or fried foods) as it defeats oxygenation. Avoid products that say "hydrogenated".
"We should eat essential polyunsaturated fatty acids to enhance oxygenation. They can be found naturally in Carotene, Saffron, and Flaxseed oil."
REFERENCES
1. "Promotion and Prevention of Tumour Growth Effects of Endotoxin, Inflamation, and Dietary Lipids", by Raymond Kearney, Ph.D, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, N.S.W. 2006 Australia. International Clinical Nutrition Review, October, 1987 Vol.
7, No. 4.
2. Roehm, "Townsend Letter for Doctors", July 1990
3. Ed McCabe, "Oxygen Therapies"
4. "The natural way to better health and longer life", Bullivant.
5. Arlin J. Brown, "March of Truth On Cancer", (seventh edition). Summary of 79 nontoxic cancer treatments. Available from the Arlin J. Brown Information Centre Inc., P.O. Box 251, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 22060. Ph: 1-703-752-9511.
--------------------------------------...
Who is Dr. Johanna Budwig?
Dr. Johanna Budwig is known and highly respected around the world as Germany's premier biochemist. In addition, Dr. Budwig holds a Ph.D. in Natural Science, has undergone medical training, and was schooled in pharmaceutical science, physics, botany and biology. In all courses, this brilliant scientist excelled.
She is best known for her extensive research on the properties and benefits of flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins in the diet, and over the years has published a number of books on the subject, including "Cancer--A Fat Problem," "The Death of the Tumor," and "True Health Against Arteriosclerosis, Heart Infarction %26amp; Cancer."
Dr. Budwig has assisted many seriously ill individuals, even those given up as terminal by orthodox medical practitioners, to regain their health through a simple regimen of nutrition. The basis of Dr. Budwig's program is the use of flaxseed oil blended with low-fat cottage cheese.
In the mid 1950's, Dr. Budwig began her long and meticulous research on the importance of essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic) in the diet. Her subsequent discoveries and announcements sparked mixed reactions. While the general public was eager for this astounding information, German manufacturers of commercial dietary fats (margarine, hard shortening, vegetable oils) went to extremes to prevent her from publishing her findings. Fortunately, while Dr. Budwig's vital announcements were initially met with resistance backed by those with financial stakes in the commercial fats industry, her persistence paid off. Today, Dr. Johanna Budwig is world renowned for her important discoveries on the benefits of flaxseed oil. Her fame precedes her as she lectures all over Europe.
Fats-Good and Bad
Dr. Johanna preaches against the use of what she calls "pseudo" fats. In order to extend the shelf life of their products, manufacturers use chemical processes that render their food products harmful to the body. These harmful fats go by a number of names, including "hydrogenated," "partially hydrogenated" and even "polyunsaturated."
The chemical processing of fats destroys the vital electron cloud within the fat. Once the electrons have been removed, these fats can no longer bind with oxygen, and they actually become a harmful substance deposited within the body. The heart, for instance, rejects these fats and they end up as inorganic fatty deposits on the heart muscle itself.
Chemically processed fats are not water-soluble when bound to protein. They end up blocking circulation, damage heart action, inhibit cell renewal and impede the free flow of blood and lymph fluids. The bio-electrical action in these areas slows down and may become completely paralyzed. The entire organism shows a measurable loss of electrical energy which is replenished only by adding active lipids to the diet. These nutritional fats are truly vital for man and beast alike.
Science has proven that fats play an important role in the functioning of the entire body. Fats (lipids) are vital for all growth processing, renewal of cells, brain and nerve functions, even for the sensory organs (eyes and ears), and for the body's adjustment to heat, cold and quick temperature changes. Our energy resources are based on lipid metabolism. To function efficiently, cells require true polyunsaturated, live electron-rich lipids, present in abundance in raw flaxseed oil. True polyunsaturated fats greedily absorb proteins and oxygen and pump them through the system.
Lipids are only water-soluble and free-flowing when bound to protein; thus the importance of protein-rich cottage cheese. When high quality, electron-rich fats are combined with proteins, the electrons are protected until the body requires energy. This energy source is then fully and immediately available to the body on demand, as nature intended.
Proven Benefits Still Pouring In
Since Dr. Johanna Budwig's findings on the benefits of flaxseed oil have been widely publicized, scientists around the world have eagerly jumped on the bandwagon. Studies conducted using flaxseed oil on numerous disorders have been pouring in from all over the world, showing impressive results, including anti-tumor activity, increased metabolism, greatly boosted immune system, reduced cholesterol levels, normalized blood pressure levels and inhibition of cancer cell growth. Books research reports, articles and testimonials abound, all touting the healthy benefits achieved by supplementing the diet with organic, raw, cold-pressed flaxseed oil with low-fat cottage cheese. Dr. Budwig's research was based on using the ratio of 2 tablespoons flaxseed oil mixed with one-quarter cup of low fat cottage cheese.
Backed with all this extensive research, the indisputable fact is: Supplementing your diet daily with flaxseed oil combined with sulphurated proteins could very well be the most important thing you do for yourself every day.
--------------------------------------...
A top European cancer research scientist, Dr Johanna Budwig, has
discovered a totally natural formula that not only protects against the
development of cancer but people all over the world who have been diagnosed
with incurable cancer and sent home to die have actually been cured and now
lead normal healthy lives.
After three decades of research Dr. Budwig, sixtime nominee for the Nobel
Award, found that the blood of seriously ill cancer patients was always,
without exception, deficient in certain important essential ingredients
which included substances called phosphatides and lipoproteins. (The blood
of a healthy person always contains sufficient quantities of these essential
ingredients. However, without these natural ingredients cancer cells grow
wild and out of control.)
Blood analysis showed a strange greenish-yellow substance in place of the
healthy red oxygen carrying hemoglobin that belongs there. This explained
why cancer patients weaken and become anemic This startling discovery led
Dr. Budwig to test her theory.
She found that when these natural ingredients where replaced over
approximately a three month period, tumors gradually receded. The strange
greenish elements in the blood were replaced with healthy red blood cells as
the phosphatides and lipoproteins almost miraculously reappeared. Weakness
and anemia disappeared and life energy was restored. Symptoms of cancer,
liver dysfunction and diabetes were completely alleviated.
Dr. Budwig then discovered an all natural way for people to replace those
essential ingredients their bodies so desperately needed in their daily
diet. By simply eating a combination of just two natural and delicious
foods not only can cancer be prevented but in case after case it was
actually cured. (These two natural foods, organic flax seed oil %26amp; cottage
cheese) must be eaten together to be effective since one triggers the
properties of the other to be released.)
After more than 10 years of solid clinical application, Dr. Budwig's natural
formula has proven successful where many orthodox remedies have failed. Dr.
Budwig's formula has been used therapeutically in Europe for prevention of:
Cancer! Arteriosclerosis, Strokes, Cardiac Infarction, Heartbeat
(irregular), Liver (fatty degeneration), Lungs (reduces bronchial
spasms), Intestines (regulates activity). Stomach Ulcers (normalizes
gastric juices), Prostate (hypertopic), Arthritis (exerts a favorable
influence), Eczema (assists all skin diseases), Old age (improves many
common afflictions), Brain (strenghthens activity), Immune Deficiency
Syndromes (multiple sclerosis, autoimmune illnesses)
Thousands have flocked to hear Dr. Budwig lecture all over Europe. The many
people Dr. Budwig's formula has helped testify to the benefits of her
remarkable discovery. Following are a few examples: In one of my interviews
with Dr. Budwig I was introduced to Siegried Ernst, M.D.. He is a rare and
dedicated man who counts among his personal friends the current Pope as well
as many other dignitaries.
--------------------------------------...
Testimonials :
Dr. Ernst
Seventeen years ago Dr. Ernst had developed cancer for which he had
major surgery requiring removal of his stomach. Two years later he had a
recurrence of the cancer and was offered chemotherapy as the only available
remedy. There was little hope for survival as virtually all individuals with
recurrence of this type of cancer rarely last a year.
Dr. Ernst knew that chemotherapy was not only ineffective for his type of
cancer but completaly destructive of the quality of life, so he refused.
He turned to Dr. Budwig and her formula for help. He religiously followed
Dr. Budwig's formula and fifteen years later has not had any recurrence of
cancer. As a matter of fact he seemed to me to be in perfect health and is
tireless for a man in his late seventies.
--------------------------------------...
Maria W.
Maria W. tells her story in her own words: "I was told by the most expert of
doctors that I would have to be operated on to cut out the cancerous tumor
that was causing a swelling under my eye. They explained that the size of
the tumor was much greater inside and that there was very serious bone
involvement. The malignancy was too far advanced to respond to radiation
treatment. The doctors planned to remove considerable facial tissue and
bone. I was afraid for my life, but being a young woman, couldn't bear the
thought of such disfigurement.
When I heard about Dr. Budwig's natural formula, I was skeptical but
desperate for help. After four months on this regimen, the swelling under my
left eye completely disappeared. The doctors at the University hospital gave
me many exhausting tests. One told me, 'If I didn't have your previous
x-rays and medical history in front of me, I wouldn't believe that you ever
had cancer. There is hardly any indication of a tumor remaining.' I never
thought using Dr, Budwig's formula would be so successful. My whole family
and I are very grateful."
--------------------------------------...
Sandy A.
An examination of Sandy A. revealed arachnoidal bleeding due to an
inoperable brain tumor. The doctors informed Sandy that he was beyond
medical help. At his expressed wish, Sandy was discharged from the
hospital and sent home to die in peace.
A friend brought Dr. Budwigs formula to Sandys attention. Sandy writes.
Since I went on the Budwig regimen, the paralysis is of my eyes, arms, and
legs has receded daily. After only a short period of time, I was able to
urinate normally. My health improved so rapidly that I was soon able to
return to my work part-time. Shortly after that, I was again examined at the
Research Center and my reflexes were completely normal. The Budwig diet
saved my life! Ten years later, I was given a thorough examination at the
Center as a follow-up. My incredible recovery has been written up In many
medical journals and I have become what they call a 'textbook case,' and
all because of Dr. Johanna Budwig's simple diet."
--------------------------------------...
Timmy G.
Seven years ago Timmy G. was diagnosed as having Hodgkins disease. The child
was operated on and underwent 24 radiation treatments, plus additional
experimental therapies that the experts hoped would be of some small help.
When Timmy failed to respond favorably to these heroic measures, he was
discharged as incurable, and given six months to live and sent home to die.
The desperate parents contacted specialists all over the world. A famous
newspaper took up Timmy's cause and ran editorials pleading for someone to
come forth who could offer hope for the life of a child. All the specialists
who replied confirmed the cruel prognosis: There was no hope or help for
Timmy.
At this dark hour the miracle the family had prayed for happened!
Timmy's mother told her story to the press: "A friend sent me a printed piece about one of Dr. Budwig's speeches. This material gave us hope and I contacted Dr. Budwig.
In just five days, (on the Budwig regimen) Timmy's breathing became normal
for the first lime In almost two years.
From this day on, Timmy began to feel good again. He went back to school, started swimming and by winter he was doing craft work. Everyone who knows him says how well he looks." At age 18 Timmy is showing great promise in his university work. He knows he owes his life to Dr. Budwig and thanks her daily in his prayers.
One of the two foods in on Budwig's formula, cottage cheese, is available
in nearly every grocery store in America. The other, pure organic linseed
oil, however comes primarily from Europe and can only be found in certain
health food stores throughout the United States.
By simply mixing these two delicious foods together and eating them you will
be providing yourself and your family with the optimal preventive
nutritional protection against cancer and other disease.
--------------------------------------...
Today, fresh expeller pressed flaxseed oil is available in most countries in the world, including USA and Europe.
Books to read:
"Flax Oil As a True Aid Against Arthritis Heart Infarction Cancer and Other Diseases"
by Johanna Dr. Budwig
Amazon Price: $5.56
Read more about this title...
"The Breuss Cancer Cure" : Advice for the Prevention and Natural Treatment of Cancer, Leukemia and Other Seemingly Incurable Diseases
by Rudolf Breuss Amazon Price : $11.00
"A Cancer Therapy" : Results of Fifty Cases and the Cure of Advanced Cancer by Diet Therapy : A Summary of 30 Years of Clinical Experimentation
by M. Max Gerson Amazon Price: $24.95
Read more about this title...
Flax Oil by Dr Budwig
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0...
http://www.oxytherapy.com/mail-archive/o...
Flax Oil and Cancer -A Tape Transcription by Clifford Beckwith
http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flax1...
Links to Other Flaxseed Oil %26amp; Health Sites
http://www.public.usit.net/spinner/Flaxl...
Dr. Budwig and The Healing Power of Flaxseed (Commercial site)
http://www.barleans.com/budwig.html
Essential Fatty Acids for Kids Superimmunity
http://www.healthychild.com/efa.htm
Flaxseed and the Immune System @ http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut16.htm
The Importance of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Adults and Children
http://www.flaxcouncil.ca/flaxnut11.htm
Essential Fatty Acids: Are You Deficient In These Key Nutrients?
http://www.barleans.com/deficient.html
Other Pages On This Site About Cancer:
What Doctors say about Chemo Therapy here
What Doctors say about Radiation Therapy here
What doctors say about Breast cancer ? here
Cancer cause : Dental Risk ? here
Govallo http://home.earthlink.net/~emptherapies/...
Burzynski http://catalog.com/bri/bri.htm
Cancer %26amp; Nutrition Articles
http://drcranton.com/nutrition.htm Nutrition In The News
Diet
Gerson
http://www.gerson.com/history.html
http://www.1999.com/gerson/
http://www.gerson.com/cnb104.html
http://gerson.org/booklist.html..acancer...
Gerson Institute http://www.gerson.org/index.html
**************************************...
Tibetan Buddhist Monks - Sacred Healing Chant
EFAs, Oxygenation and Cancer Prevention
Cancer as well as heart disease can be prevented by taking a ratio of at least 1:1 up to 2.5:1 unadulterated parent omega-6 to
omega-3 essential fatty acids plus specific vitamins and minerals.
--------------------------------------...
Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number 1 (December 2006 - January 2007)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. editor@nexusmagazine.com
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com
© 2006 by Prof. Brian Scott Peskin, BSEE (MIT)1
Website: http://www.BrianPeskin.com
Based on his book, co-written with
Amid Habib, MD, FAAP, FACE,
The Hidden Story of Cancer
(Pinnacle Press, Houston, USA, 2006)
--------------------------------------...
The prime cause of cancer is not genetic
Cancer was once an uncommon disease affecting a small percentage of Americans. In 1900, only 3% of the population died of cancer.2 But now, cancer has become so common that virtually everyone knows someone afflicted with this terrible disease. In fact, for the average American, contraction of cancer isn't the exception; instead, it has become the rule.3 We've come to accept cancer as unstoppable, incurable and even a natural part of life. This perception is a tragedy, since cancer is not a natural disease for man and is preventable.
What is shocking to most people, is the scientific fact that cancer is genetically recessive, not dominant. In fact, the human body is highly resistant to cancer. In 1969, Professor Henry Harris of Oxford University shook the cancer research community to its core when he proved these previous theories wrong. Professor Harris took normal tissue cells and fused three types of cancer cells to them. Surely, he thought, the cancer cells would take over the normal cells and "convert" them into cancer. Surprisingly, they grew normally.4
Contrary to popular opinion, cancer takes several decades to develop in humans.5 Given this long incubation period, science can show us the way to destroy any initial pre-cancerous cells and keep the cancerous ones from causing widespread damage.
If you think cancer has a genetic basis, then think again. Dr Robert A. Weinberg of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the world's leading cancer researchers and discoverer of the so-called oncogene (cancer-causing gene), reversed his previous conclusions after discovering that "fewer than one DNA base in a million appears to have been miscopied". It's not enough of a defect! His exact words: "Something was very wrong. The notion that a cancer developed through the successive activation of a series of oncogenes had lost its link to reality." He called the genetic discoveries made thus far "sterile".6 The prime cause of cancer is therefore not genetic. This was announced in 1998. Did you hear about it? Probably not.
In 2006, the heads of the world's largest cancer research centre in Houston, Texas, announced that cancer's prime cause isn't genetic: "'If it could have happened [solving cancer with genetics], it would have already happened with genetic mutations,' said William Brinkley, a senior vice-president at Baylor who says other research should take precedence over the cancer genome projectÉ Dr John Mendelsohn [president of M. D. Anderson Cancer Center] states, 'Any claims that this [genetic research] is going to be the key to curing cancer are not appropriate.'"7
Thus, the prime cause of cancer is not a genetic mutation. Even if cancer "runs in your family", there is real hope. Unfortunately, the geneticists have it backwards, attempting to force the facts to fit their genetics-based theories when they don't fit the facts, because, as Professor Harris demonstrated many years ago, cancer isn't genetically dominant. Where does this leave us? Where can we look for solutions? What about the popular nutritional solutions to fighting cancer?
The popular anti-cancer "solutions" don't work
Most people diligently follow the experts' recommendations in the hope of winning the war on cancer. Unfortunately, virtually nothing of what we are told is based on scientific facts. Consider the following list of supposed "solutions", along with the date of their published failures as reported in the world's leading medical journals. Many of us never hear of the retractions and consequently keep following methods that don't protect us from contracting cancer.
(a) Fruits and vegetables: Even the green leafy vegetables don't protect against contracting breast cancer (JAMA 2001; 285:769-776).8
(b) Fibre: This worsens colon cancer rather than helping prevent it (Lancet 2000; 356:1286-7).9
(c) Mammography: Samuel S. Epstein, MD (chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition), Rosalie Bertell and Barbara Seaman published an article exposing truths about mammography that most women have never been told (Int J Health Sci 2001; 31(3):605-15): "Contrary to popular belief and assurances by the US media...mammography is not a technique for early diagnosis. In fact, a breast cancer has usually been present for about eight (8) years before it can finally be detected..."10
(d) Fish oil: Most fish oil supplements are worthless in preventing cancer and may be hazardous to your health (articles: 1995Ð2006). The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) 4th Congress, which met on 4Ð9 June 2000 in Tsukuba, Japan, reported the following:11
"...[S]tudies indicate that at the levels used, fish oil [comprised of omega-3 derivatives] decreases a wide range of immune cell responses (natural killer cell, cytotoxic T lymphocyte activities, lymphocyte proliferation and production of IL-2 and IFN-y (1,2))..."
"...Recent studies have indicated that relatively low levels of the long chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA or DHA)...are sufficient to bring about some of the suppressive effects..."
"...This decrease (of inhibited lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity) causes increased cellular bacteria [infection] and impaired tumor cell killing."
Any substance causing impaired tumour cell killing ability is cancer-causingÑthe opposite of what we desire. With so many of us consuming fish oil, could this be another reason that cancer contraction rates are increasing instead of decreasing?
Fish oil is also worthless in preventing heart disease, and Harvard Medical School warned us about this years ago but too few Americans listened.12 Consuming whole fish instead of fish oil failed, too.13
The Japanese have greater cancer rates and greater heart disease rates than Americans. Cancer has been Japan's number-one cause of death since 1981.14 The popular media don't often disclose these startling facts.
In January 2006, the omega-3 anti-cancer fallacy was exposed (JAMA 2006; 295(4)): "A large body of literature spanning numerous cohorts from many countries and with different demographic characteristics does not provide evidence to suggest a significant association between omega-3 fatty acids and [lack of] cancer incidence. Dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids [is] unlikely to prevent cancer."15
The most comprehensive analysis to date, published in the British Medical Journal of 24 March 2006, reviewing 96 trials including 44 trials with supplements and five trials consisting of mainly ALA (parent omega-3) from plants like flax with the remainder being fish oil, confirms the anti-cancer failure: "We found no evidence that omega-3 fats had an effect on the incidence of cancer and there was no inconsistency... This systematic review assessed the health effects of using omega-3 fats (together or separately) on total mortality, cardiovascular events, cancer and strokes in a wide variety of participants and found no evidence of a clear benefit of omega-3 fats on health."16
Unfortunately, in spite of these facts, most physicians around the world still recommend fish oil to prevent both cancer and heart disease.
(e) Soy: Soy products won't protect you against contracting cancer, either. The properties of soy are still touted by nutritionists, physicians and popular health and beauty publications, all ignorant of the scientific facts. There is a very hazardous side to soy that you need to know about. For example, the article "Soybean Goiter: Report of Three Cases" (NEJM 1960; 262(22):1099-1103) details three cases of infants developing goitre when they were consuming soybean "formula". The condition was rapidly eliminated in two of the infants when the soy "formula" was terminated. The third child was cured when iodine was added to the diet.17
What did soy formula have to do with thyroid (goitre) problems? Soybeans are a source of isoflavonoids, including genistein and daidzein. Contrary to popular belief and what is often reported in the media, they are both hazardous to your health. The following comes from Biochemical Pharmacology 1997; 54:1087-96): "Soybeans contain compounds (genistein and daidzein-the 'active ingredients') that inhibit [interfere with] thyroid peroxidase (TPO) which is essential to thyroid hormone synthesis [production]." Soybeans are not good for the thyroid! The popular so-called phyto-oestrogens genistein and daidzein are actually endocrine disruptors. Women around the world have been misled. What does soy "formula" have to do with the iodine deficiency? Soy contains phytates which "magnetise out" essential nutrients like iodine.
Today, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services, lists 288 records of soy at its "FDA Poisonous Plant Database" (March 2006 revision). Their website will shock you as you discover that soy is anything but a health food (http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~djw/pltx.cgi?Q...
Soy harms your immune system, too. Back in 1975, the Canadian Journal of Biochemistry reported that soybeans actually weaken your immune system:21 "Soybean trypsin inhibitor was found to inhibit transformation of human lymphocytes..."
Here's why this happens. Trypsin is an enzyme produced by your pancreas and used in digesting protein; it is critical for antibody production. An inhibitor is something that disables. Think of it like having one foot on the gas and another on the brake of your automobile at the same time. Your car's engine would blow up.
So a trypsin inhibitor will irritate your pancreas, stressing it to produce hormones when it can't, leading to decreased oxygenation from the irritation. Soy prevents the protein you eat from being fully utilised and digested. Your immune system can't get fuelled with proper antibodies and lymphocytes--a double whammy. Therefore, soy is cancer-causing to your pancreas, and cancer of the pancreas is typically a death sentence. Because of bad advice, many women especially have decreased the amount of cancer-fighting animal-based protein they consume in favour of soy. Resist this incorrect advice and minimise your chances of contracting both thyroid and pancreatic cancer.
Dr Otto Warburg's anti-cancer research
Many of my physician colleagues were shocked to discover these truths. How many of us saw these important medical journal findings reported in the popular press? Unfortunately, not enough of us. Don't despair, because there is an anti-cancer answer. It was discovered back in 1925 by Otto Warburg, MD, PhD. Dr Warburg has been referred to as the greatest biochemist of the 20th century; the sheer number and magnitude of his discoveries qualify him as the most accomplished biochemist of all time.22
In the 1920s, Dr Warburg carried on the research on respiratory enzymes, certain vitamins and minerals that the body requires for the utilisation of oxygen in the cells, which eventually earned him the Nobel Prize in 1931. (Today, these vitamins and minerals are termed "co-enzymes".) The Nobel Committee clearly expected the medical world to benefit through Otto Warburg's vital discoveries about cancer. Unfortunately, politics intervened and cancer wasn't eradicated.
Despite his early successes and honours, Dr Warburg continued to make major fundamental discoveries throughout his later years as well, capping off an amazingly fruitful 60-year career in research. In addition, Dr Warburg often created new tools for his research. For example, he discovered how to measure the pressure of oxygen in a living cell by developing a special manometerÑa very important development that led to his discovery that low oxygen concentration and pressure always presaged the development of cancer.
The importance of Dr Warburg's achievement is that he isolated the functional prime cause of cancer. Rather than working on a theoretical level too far removed from the physiological realities of cancer to be able to provide practical therapies and preventive programs, he described the actual conditions in the cells that set up and cause cancer, and by doing this made it possible for others later to develop functional, practical ways to inhibit the development of cancer.
It is appalling that no significant principle out of his numerous discoveries has been utilised by the US medical research community for cancer prevention, treatment and remission retention. Despite the expression of opinions disputing the direction and validity of Warburg's work, no scientist or researcher has ever disproved the validity, correctness or applicability of these important discoveries to the prevention and cure of cancer. Even today, medical consensus often has little to do with science. Politics has squandered the efforts of many cancer researchers.
The prime cause of cancer
We have become so accustomed to being told that "some day" we might discover what causes cancer and that cancer is the major medical mystery of our modern time, that the following might be hard to believe.
Dr Otto Warburg discovered and clearly stated that the prime, most basic, cause of cancer is too little oxygen getting into the cell. "We find by experiment about 35% inhibition of oxygen respiration already suffices to bring about such a transformation during cell growth," he stated at a 1966 conference of Nobel laureates in Lindau, Germany.28
That's it! It sounds very simple, doesn't it? Just one-third less oxygen than normal and you contract cancer. Based on meticulous experiments that he and many others verified numerous times, Dr Warburg discovered and stated that the prime, number-one cause of cancer is simply too little oxygen getting into the cell (hypoxia).
It gets worse because once a cell becomes cancerous, it can't return to normal; it must be destroyed (Science 1956; 123(3191)).29
When I first encountered this information, I didn't believe it. Even now, there is still no one who is more shocked than I am! To my amazement, this cancer-oxygen connection information has been published numerous times in recent cancer journals, e.g., Radiotherapy and Oncology 1993; 26(1):45-50 and 1999; 53:113-17.30 However, the practical solution to solving the oxygen deficiency problem has evaded researchersÑprobably because they haven't known where to start.
Taking hydrogen peroxide, calcium supplements, fish oil supplements, massive amounts of omega-3, ozone or so-called "oxygenated water" won't solve the cellular oxygen deficiency. No one has been able to advance Dr Warburg's discovery until now.
This lack of understanding explains many of the misunderstood biochemical activities related to cancer that waste precious time and lead virtually nowhere. Only Dr Warburg's anti-cancer discovery predicts so many never-before-explained real-life results.31
Dr Warburg's discovery has been verified numerous times both in turning normal cells cancerous and in showing that cancer doesn't develop in highly oxygenated areas. Surprisingly, it was American physicians who conclusively proved it in 1953 and confirmed it in 1955! Goldblatt and Cameron noted (p. 535) (J. Experimental Medicine 1953; 97:535-552) that once damage is too great to the cell, then no amount of oxygen will return the cell's respiration back to normal: it is forever doomed to a cancerous life.
This is why prevention is the ultimate solution to never contracting cancer. However, they confirmed it is possible to prevent a "respiration-impacted" precancerous cell from becoming permanently cancerous if oxygen deficiency is stopped early enough.32
Secondary causes of cancer
Virtually every supposed cause of cancer mentioned today in the health and nutritional media is a secondary cause. Secondary causes include things such as environment, chemical carcinogens, environmental and medical radiation, trans-fats, food additives, the chemicals in tobacco smoke, viruses and even genetic mutations.
There are innumerable secondary causes of cancer, and minimising them and their harmful effects can be helpful in preventing cancer. But endlessly pursuing new secondary causes, like smoking, without explaining specifically what common effect they have on the cells, has never led, and will never lead, researchers to a real cancer cure.
Dr Warburg cautioned us again and again about wasting precious time pursuing secondary causes. Make no mistake about this: the thing every secondary cause of cancer has in common with every other one is that it leads, directly or indirectly, to insufficient oxygen in the cells. Therefore, if we directly address the question of how to get sufficient oxygen into the cells, we will have minimised the danger from every type of secondary cause.
Exercise is not the solution to remaining cancer-free
I know what many of you are likely thinking: "I exercise a lot, therefore I am oxygenating my blood. I've got cancer beat!" No. All that exercise didn't stop world champion cyclist Lance Armstrong from contracting cancer. It is true that by exercising you are increasing oxygenation to your blood. However, by doing so, you still haven't guaranteed that this oxygen will be transferred effectively to each cell in each organ in your body.
Dr Warburg made it quite clear that oxygen alone is not sufficient: "To be sure, cancer development takes place even in the presence of free oxygen gas in the atmosphere, but this oxygen may not penetrate in sufficient quantity into the growing body cells, or the respiratory apoenzymes of the growing body cells may not be saturated with the active groups."34
There are many factors that promote the lack of cellular oxygen, including certain deficiencies we will talk about shortly. Exercise, by itself, is therefore not the solution to remaining cancer free. Many people, including athletes, who exercise regularly still get cancer. Furthermore, a person breathes at least 17,000 times a day (12 breaths a minute). Do you really think that you aren't breathing in enough oxygen with 17,000 breaths a day? You are. The problem lies elsewhere.
Essential fatty acids and EFA-containing oils
The body requires special fats that, among other important functions, make it possible for sufficient oxygen to reach the cells via the cellular membranes, which are the key. These special fats are highly oxygen-absorbing. Called essential fatty acids, or EFAs, these special fats must be supplied from outside the body every day, from foods and certain oils, because your body can't manufacture them on its own. There are two "parent" forms of EFAs that allow your body to make whatever it needs from them, i.e., various types of EFA "derivatives". Parent omega-6 is termed linoleic acid (LA), and parent omega-3 is termed alpha-linolenic acid (ALA).
For tables of EFA-containing oils, shown with their percentages of parent omega-6 to parent omega-3, as well as of some EFA derivatives, see http://www.BrianPeskin/Nexus.com. With all the hoopla about olive oil, I want you to know that it contains mainly omega-9, a non-essential oil that your body itself makes. "Extra virgin" olive oil is traditionally unprocessed and therefore not cancer-causing, but it won't protect you against contracting cancer in the least. Avoid margarine: it won't go bad even when kept out of the fridge. This is the proof of hydrogenated oil's failure to oxygenate. If it still could oxygenate when eaten, it would turn rancid when left unrefrigerated--just like fish does. Canola and soy oils are not recommended; neither was ever meant for human consumption but as food for farm animals or for industrial applications. Many foods, especially salad dressings, now contain canola oil. You should try to avoid it.
The oils must be uncooked, or at the very least only slightly heated, to retain their important nutritional properties. Also bear in mind that some supplement manufacturers' labels fail to separately identify and distinguish the parent EFAs from the EFA derivatives. It may be impossible to tell whether you are getting the parent EFAs or the EFA derivatives. Make certain of what you're getting before you purchase it. Make sure the oils are raw, unprocessed and organic and that they do not contain fish oil or any hydrogenated oils.
Omega-6 versus omega-3 ratios in the body
We must look at the tissue content of our bodies to determine what oils contain the best anti-cancer EFAs. It is known from pathology studies that the brain and nervous system have a ratio of one part omega-6 to one part omega-3 (1:1). Some nutritionists suggest that this ratio is best, but they are wrong. Here's why.
Most organs contain a 4:1 omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. However, the brain, nervous system and organs comprise only about 12% of body weight. Skin is 100% parent omega-6 and contains no omega-3;35 it comprises about 4% of body weight. The muscles comprise at least 50% of total body weight and are the prime factor to account for in determining the required parent omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. A key fact about muscle structure is that muscle contains from 5.5 to 7.5 times more omega-6 than omega-3, depending on the degree of physical condition.36 We are warned about "overdosing" on omega-6 in our diets and told that we must take lots of oils containing omega-3 to compensate. We are told that we are ingesting upwards of 20 times too much omega-6. This is wrong, and there is much more to the analysis.
Scientifically, you need an organic supplement with a ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 of 1:1 up to 2.5:1. With this powerfully effective ratio, you only require a minimum amount of 3-4 grams on a daily basis. This ratio is significantly different than your physician, health practitioner or writers on popular nutritional publications will likely suggest: they simply don't know and understand the basis of it. Their analysis consists of a significant number of errors, and I hope you will review the paper "The Scientific Calculation of the Optimum Omega 6/3 Ratio" at http://www.BrianPeskin.com (click on "EFA Report") so you will understand this as well as the science behind the calculation of the ideal omega-6 to omega-3 ratio.
Today, people automatically think of fish oil or flax oil as the anti-cancer solution. Following these incorrect recommendations is a significant factor in why America's cancer rates continue to skyrocket in spite of millions of people taking these oils. Fish oil, with an overdose of omega-3 series derivatives, can actually be cancer-causing-the opposite of what we desire--and flax oil contains far too much parent omega-3.
Most parent omegas do not get converted to derivatives; they remain in the cell membranes and tissues in original parent form. Few scientists understand this and few medical texts explain it.37 Furthermore, commercial food processing destroys a significant amount of these EFAs, along with their oxygenating ability.
EFA-containing foods in the diet
Here's a representative listing of categories of foods containing these essential oils. It is imperative to understand that these foods must be grown organically and, if necessary, processed with low heat and no artificial preservatives-otherwise the EFAs will be ruined, like the trans-fat, hydrogenated, cancer-causing oils you've heard about. Compare your diet and these EFA-containing foods. Are you getting enough of them?
Dairy/eggs/cheese: "Raw milk" cheeses and organic eggs are excellent sources of EFAs. Pasteurised (heated) milk is deficient in EFAs and is detrimental to infants.
Meats: Organically raised and processed chicken, beef (grass-fed is best38), lamb, pork, etc. are rich sources of EFAs. Animal-based protein is also important for obtaining anti-cancer vitamins and minerals and for producing strong haemoglobin which enables oxygen transportation.
Nuts: Organic, unprocessed raw almonds, walnuts, peanuts, cashews, etc.
Seafood: Shrimp (prawns), fish, lobster, crab, clams, oysters, etc. It is important to understand that consuming lots of seafood is not the anti-cancer answer. Seafood is overly abundant in both parent and derivative omega-3 EFAs. Fish, especially farmed fish, contains mostly omega-3 derivatives; farmed fish and oil from farmed fish are to be avoided.
Seeds: Organic sunflower, sesame, flax, pumpkin, etc.
The following foods do not contain usable EFAs for humans:
Fruits and vegetables: Animals with multiple stomachs can extract EFAs out of plant-based cellulose like grass, but humans, with only one stomach, cannot. Even if we could extract the EFAs, we could never eat the volume required to get enough.
Grains/cereals: Humans cannot extract the EFAs from them.
The miracle of EFA "oxygen magnets"
Think of these polyunsaturated EFAs as "oxygen magnets". The proof of this fact is buried in the world's leading medical textbooks and medical journals such as Harper's Illustrated Biochemistry, 26th edition,40 and Human Nutrition Clinical Nutrition, July 1984.41
EFAs are integral to the structure and function of cellular respiration. Without high respiration efficiency, cancer is soon to follow. These EFA oxygen magnets in the cell membrane attract the oxygen that's in the bloodstream and transfer it into the cell, just like little oxygen sponges. This process is supposed to be happening in each of the body's 100 trillion cells.
So, no matter how much you breathe or exercise, if you don't have the proper functional EFAs at the cellular level then your cells will not absorb enough oxygen from your bloodstream and you will be that much more susceptible to cancer. Remember that the cancer "threshold" is a 35% decrease in cellular oxygen.
Without a continuing new supply of these EFAs from food, cellular oxygen transfer is significantly reduced. Imagine what would happen if you had 100 trillion cells that were all deficient in a vital substance they required to be able to absorb oxygen.
Here's an example showing how these essential fats absorb oxygen. At the supermarket, fish goes bad in only a few days because the oil in the fish is highly oxygen-absorbing-it reacts rapidly with the oxygen in the air. Fish spoils rapidly because the EFA-containing oil has the capacity to absorb lots of oxygen. This chemical process is called oxidation. This is also true with other types of essential fats. They do their job of absorbing oxygen, but because of it they have a limited life. They simply won't work after a short period. EFAs become "spent", i.e., rancid. That's why they need to be replaced every day from our food-Nature designed us this way.
There are many ways to add additional oxygen to the bloodstream, such as by exercising, drinking "oxygenated" water or breathing purer air. However, these partial solutions are insufficient for maximum anti-cancer protection. When the EFA deficiency is solved, every organ becomes its own "oxygen magnet", just as Nature intended.
Breast cancer and oxygen deficiency
Breast cancer is the number-one cancer plague to women worldwide. The growing incidence of breast cancer can be explained for the first time in light of Dr Warburg's discovery about lack of oxygen to the cells.
The breasts consist of an exceptionally high amount of fatty tissue. A typical cell membrane in muscle tissue is half-fat and contains about one-third EFAs (oxygen transferors). However, fatty tissue like the breast contains areas of 80-95% fat concentration. These fatty components of breast tissue require and should have high EFA concentrations, but because of modern food processing they don't. Because important organs such as the brain, heart, lungs and kidneys require EFAs on a priority basis, there may not be enough left over to ensure that breast tissue receives an adequate amount of EFAs.
Therefore, oxygen deficiency in the breast tissue will be very significant.
Given this premise, we can deduce that breast tissue should and would be the number-one expected cancer site in women worldwide, and it is. This conclusion makes so much sense in explaining the massive rise in breast cancer rates. Harvard's Dr W. C. Willett gives us the proof. In a study on the intake of parent omega-6 involving over 80,000 nurses, it was shown that the group with the lowest intake of linoleic acid (parent omega-6) exhibited the highest incidence of breast cancer (NEJM 1987; 316(1):22-28).42
Has your ob-gyn told you that you need this miraculous anti-cancer nutrient? I doubt it; he or she probably doesn't know.
Fish oil won't stop heart disease
Surprisingly, it was known back in 1979 that diet influenced EFA composition of the cell membrane; this finding was published in Cancer Research (1979; 39:1726-32).43 In 1990, a masterpiece of research conducted by William E. Lands found that the amount of critical parent omega-6 in the tissues was dependent on diet (Lipids 1990; 25(9):505-16).44
To gain the best in scientific research, in 2002 I attended the world's 1st Essential Fatty Acids and Human Nutrition and Health International Conference in Shanghai, China.
There I discovered a shocking and unexpected discovery that fish oil lowers immunity. I nearly fell out of my chair! Overdosing on fish oil supplements can significantly decrease the effectiveness of your immune system, increasing your risk of contracting cancer. The International Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids (ISSFAL) June 2000 Congress in Tsukuba, Japan,45 had reported this startling fact, as noted earlier.
And don't think that fish oil prevents heart disease. It doesn't. Cardiovascular Research (2002; 54:183-190) reported on a study where both the fish oil group and the control group showed close to equal atherosclerotic progression (arteries getting more clogged in spite of taking fish oil supplements). Nor did fish oil stop thickening of the artery. On the contrary, the artery wall got thicker (worsened) with fish oil ingestion! A mere 1.65 grams per day of fish oil supplement was taken-a great enough dose to cause adverse immunity and excessive internal bleeding, too.46
These results showing the failure of fish oil were published in 2002. Did this stop "experts" in the nutritional and medical fields and even in our governments from declaring how great fish oil supplements are? No!
Harvard Medical School was involved in a study, published in 1995, titled "Controlled Trial of Fish Oil for Regression of Human Coronary Atherosclerosis" (Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(7):1492-8).47
The daily dose was six grams of fish oil versus six grams of olive oil in the control group. Their conclusion? "Fish oil treatment for two years does not promote major favorable changes in the diameter of atherosclerotic coronary arteries" (author's emphasis). This means that arterial clogging was not decreased with the fish oil supplements.
Omega-6 derivative AA prevents blood clotting
Dr Warburg understood that slow blood speed allowed cancer to metastasise. Later, other researchers showed that if you can keep a localised cancer from metastasising, your risk of dying from cancer decreases by an amazing tenfold! Even though you may have cancer, you won't die from it. Blood speed and viscosity have a connection to the spread of cancer. This is a surprising, seldom-mentioned fact that was pointed out by world-renowned molecular biologist Robert Weinberg.49
What causes metastasis? Blood clots, and this is known, too.50 What prevents blood from "sticking together" and is also Nature's natural blood-thinner that prevents blood clots? No, it's not omega-3, like you are constantly told. Parent omega-6 is much more powerful. Arachidonic acid (AA) is a critical omega-6 derivative and major biochemical component which occurs in virtually every cell we have. It is the building block of the most potent anti-aggregatory ("helps blood thinning") agent known, termed prostacyclin. AA also inhibits platelet adhesion, making it a natural "blood thinner". AA even helps solve vascular problems as a response to injury.51
Heart attack victims often have depleted EFA levels, especially the EFA derivatives AA from parent omega-6 and EPA from parent omega-3.56 We need some parent omega-3 because EPA is one of its important derivatives. The problem is that fish oil supplements overdose us with far too much.
What's really clogging the arteries
Contrary to what we have heard for decades, it is not the saturated fat that clogs the arteries and impedes blood flow: it's the adulterated parent omega-6.
A groundbreaking Lancet article (1994; 344:1195-96) reported investigating the components of arterial plaques. Felton et al. measured the individual components, and in an aortic artery clog they found over 10 different compounds but no saturated fat.57 There was some cholesterol in the clog. This is explained by the fact that cholesterol acts as a protective healer for arterial cuts and bruises, just like a scab forms over external cuts.
What is the predominant component of a clog? You probably guessed it: the adulterated omega-6 polyunsaturated oils-those that start out containing properly functioning EFAs but get ruined during commercial food processing. Many similar analyses of arterial clogs showing the same result have been carried out and published in the medical journals, but it would seem that few physicians have seen them.58 The average person has little, if any, chance of ever discovering the truth.
So, it is not cholesterol itself that clogs the arteries. If you have a deficiency of EFAs, cholesterol acts as a "poison delivery system". EFAs are cholesterol's major component. As the medical textbook Molecular Biology of the Cell makes clear (p. 481), cholesterol is necessary for the structural integrity of the lipid bi-layer, the matrix in each of our 100 trillion cell membranes. JAMA (1994; 272:1335-40) published an article stating that cholesterol-lowering drugs do not work significantly to prevent heart disease. The reason? They can't lower the amount of defective parent omega-6 enough.
As stated in Current Atherosclerosis Reports (2004; 6:477-84), this is why cholesterol drugs can't do the job:59 "LDL contains up to 80% lipids [fats and oils], including polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol, mainly esters. Linoleic acid (LA), one of the most abundant fatty acids in LDLÉ"
With this information, we see that it is what the cholesterol is transporting-the adulterated EFAs-that is the problem. An article in Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition (1984; 38C:245-260) further verifies that it is parent omega-6 that makes up most of the fatty acids in LDL and HDL cholesterol.60
Don't let anyone ever tell you that natural fats are "bad". One hundred trillion cells need lots of EFA-containing natural fats; in particular, lots of parent omega-6.
If just a little of this parent omega-6 is defective, reducing its ability to absorb oxygen and perform other cellular functions, it acts as a direct cause of cancer as well as heart disease. °
Must watch video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
and then
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVtqTQEQs...
This plan's continuation is in CODEX Alimentarius ....
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.ph...
Stop Codex: Protect Health Freedom :: HealthFreedomUSA.org
http://www.parc.gov.pk/fqnp.html
PARC || FQNP at NARC
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ind...
CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
Codex Alimentarius
Current mood: awake
Category: Food and Restaurants
Codex Alimentarius is to be implemented on December 31, 2009. As if there weren't already enough unnatural ingredients in foods that have names you can't easily pronounce (nor know why they are in the food in the first place). Please check out HealthFreedomUSA to learn more about the coming implementation of this "nutricidal" plan.
According to the video of Dr. Laibow discussing Codex, there is A LOT of deception regarding Codex. Dr. Laibow exposes this deception and what will happen if Codex is not stopped.
PLEASE become informed %26amp; pass this along!
A 90% Cancer Cure Diet using Flaxseed Oil %26amp; Cottage Cheese?
This is unfounded and the use of oils in prostate cancer may worsen the condition. For other cancers and conditions, the diet is sound from a nutritional standpoint although unsupported by peer review as a cure for cancer. However, it should do no harm. But there is no miracle cure.
Reply:Breaking news! You're an idiot!
Reply:Thank you, I'm sure it will be a big help to many. I'll pass it on to as many as I can.
Reply:Screams "quack" from sentence one.
Cancer isn't one ailment, it's an entire family, maybe several families, of diseases.
Reply:That's actually really unhealthy %26amp; may actually cause cancer in the future
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)